![Telegram profile photo for [ Main bio ] Gladiator](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/e9/e9febbdf0403a4feb04b9906b16701b13b0b826723b0f5033566079cd62e8979.jpg)
Channel
@biogladik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002603983822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biogladik |
| Created | 24 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biogladik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 58 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 58 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 24 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @biogladik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 2 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2025 to 24 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✍️ 𝐌𝐀𝐈𝐍 • 𝐍𝐚𝐦𝐞: 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐫 • 𝐀𝐠𝐞: 18 • 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬: 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡, 𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚 • 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐲: 𝐅𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐚 • 𝐉𝐨𝐛: 𝐍𝐅𝐓 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐗, 𝟏𝐖𝐈𝐍 • 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 $𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐭𝐨 $𝟒𝟓𝟎𝟎 🧾 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊𝐒 • 𝐅𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐄𝐗: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐋𝐚𝐢𝐫: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐓𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐓𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦(+888): 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝: 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐬 💻 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬 • 𝟏𝐖𝐈𝐍: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 • 𝐍𝐅𝐓 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐗: 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @biogladik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 101,144 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@biogladik named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[ Main bio ] Gladiator” (@biogladik), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biogladik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.