Channel
@biminpractice
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
573subscribers
+96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002005732820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biminpractice |
| Created | 20 November 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biminpractice |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 573 | +65 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 508 | +12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 496 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 487 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 483 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 482 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 477 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 477 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
116 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 37.1% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 33.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 24.1% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📍 Локация утверждена: где пройдет «BIM на практике 2026» В этом году мы решили показать вам немного закулисья главного BIM-события года. Наш человек уже на месте — протестировал площадку, записал короткий рум-тур и эксклюзивные кадры подготовки. Локация: ✨ город Санкт-Петербург ✨ современный конференц-зал гостиницы «Космос» (Площадь Победы, 1) рядом с метро «Московская» Выбрали это место не случайно: просторные за…
❤5👍3👏2🔥2
Варианты тем:
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Осторожно, горячий микрофон! 🔥 Друзья, в этом году на BIM на практике мы в том числе нарушим традиционный формат. Хватит смотреть только на слайды — пришло время также слушать аргументы и болеть за спикеров! В программе — Дебаты по Парламентской Британской системе. 🎙 Это не просто «поговорили и разошлись». Это жесткая структура: две команды по два человека, аргументация с фактической базой и, самое вкусное, голос…
Video message, posted without a caption
Давайте поспорим? 💬 В этом году конференция «BIM на практике 2026» станет площадкой не только для докладов, но и для открытых профессиональных дебатов. Мы предлагаем обсудить не только кейсы и технологии, но и затронуть острые вопросы отрасли, по которым у специалистов действительно есть разные взгляды. Нам кажется, отрасль растёт именно через столкновение сильных аргументов, а не через единственно «правильные» отве…
👍5❤2🔥2
✍️ На BIM на практике — необычный мастер-класс по быстрому рисунку С учетом новости о запрете ввоза компьютеров — следующий навык вновь пригодится, наверное, всем, вот мы и подумали… И решили, что команда BIM на практике сама сядет в зал и будет вместе с гостями учиться быстрому рисунку у специального гостя Конференции — Эдуарда Кичигина, архитектора итальянского архитектурного бюро Architettura e Paesaggio. Он ра…
🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
Уважаемые коллеги! 14 лет подряд мы проводим конференцию «BIM на практике». 10 лет из них — платно. Зачем? Чтобы отсеять случайных. В итоге у нас одна из сильнейших аудиторий и в зале и на сцене, а наш подход переняли более молодые, но не менее известные Конференции. При этом сегодня делать вид, что ничего не происходит, мы не можем. Мы видим сокращения, задержки зарплат, замороженные проекты в Строительной отрасли…
❤8👍4🔥3
Channel name was changed to «БИМ на практике 2026»
Коллеги, здравствуйте! Мы отправили всем участникам конференции фото- и видеоматериалы на электронную почту. Вспоминайте яркие моменты BIM на практике 2025 вместе с нами! 👉Если письма нет во «Входящих» — обязательно загляните в папку «Спам» или «Промоакции». Спасибо, что были с нами и до встречи на следующих мероприятиях!
❤3👍1🔥1
Сфоткал план 👉вжух...Revit модель ПСС Артинс - ИИ для поднятия 3D моделей с 2D подложек (фото, сканы, pdf). Для кого: Архитекторов, Инженеров, Моделистов для ускорения работы в 8 раз*. Скачивайте бесплатно — пробная версия плагина действует до 26 октября. ⚡️ Что говорят инженеры:* «На такое обычно минимум 40 минут уходит, если с Автокада поднимать. У меня ушло 5 минут.» «У меня чертежи PDF 4х этажей. Надо нарисо…
❤4👏4
От BIM до ИИ и роботов в строительстве: как прошла XIII Международная конференция «BIM на практике 2025» Более 400 участников из 5 стран собрались на одной площадке, чтобы обсудить реальные решения на новые вызовы строительной индустрии. Главные темы этого года — BIM, AI и роботы. Эксперты обсудили применение цифровых технологий в национальных строительных проектах. Из ТОПовых спикеров выступили представители: ⚡️П…
👍8❤6🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @biminpractice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Варианты тем:
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@biminpractice named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БИМ на практике 2026” (@biminpractice), 573 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biminpractice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.