Channel
@biglan_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
137subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001436824511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biglan_ru |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biglan_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 137 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 141 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 142 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 144 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 144 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 88 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Лайфхак о том как заработать на эфире! Схема работала в прошлый раз, почему сейчас это должно стать исключением ? Итак, купите #ETH за 500 дней до халвинга. Продайте #ETH через 500 дней после халвинга. Профит!
🔥1
Еще одно мнение того, что мы находимся возле донных значений. Боковое движение и поход на верх.
👍1
Последние 2 месяца $BTC в период "медвежьего" рынка, как правило, характеризуются очень сильным падением 🩸. Большинство людей сейчас стали настроены оптимистично и утверждают, что дно уже пройдено. Слишком много людей игнорируют четырехлетний цикл и в итоге всегда терпят убытки 🤷♂️. Окончательная стадия панической распродажи неизбежна 📉.
$BTC Прогресс нисходящего тренда: осталось всего 2 месяца! Готовьте ваш фиат и Usdt , будем делать покупки.
$BTC Обновление структуры нисходящего тренда (медвежьего рынка) на 2026 год. Пока что все идет хорошо 👌😎 Однако, цена $BTC держится немного лучше, чем ожидалось. В любом случае, последний этап снижения в этом нисходящем тренде неизбежен 📉🩸
$BTC График за 1 неделю Похоже, на этой неделе мы можем потерять 200-недельную скользящую среднюю 👀 Как и летом 2022 года, мы потеряли 200-дневную скользящую среднюю в июне, а затем пытались вернуть ее в июле, но не смогли. Я все еще ожидаю новые минимумы 📉 🤷♂️
⚠️ Обычно в августе и сентябре годов, когда проходят промежуточные выборы, наблюдается негативная динамика для $BTC 😏📉
💰Этот медвежий рынок в BTC продвинулся всего на 49%. Все предыдущие достигали дна значительно ниже этого показателя. — Glassnode
$BTC Лето 2022 года против лета 2026 года. 50-недельная скользящая средняя продолжает снижаться. Одинаковый отрицательный уклон: -45° Тенденция остается нисходящей. Завершающая стадия медвежьего рынка приближается 🤫
Потенциальный дамп #BTC до ~45000$ уже в августе этого года – в X (Twitter) считают, что текущий нисходящий тренд еще не завершен. Также считаем и мы, о наших целях было чуть выше.
$BTC Индикатор MVRV Z-Score еще не достиг нижней границы зеленой зоны. Поэтому не стоит слишком сильно радоваться этому небольшому отскоку $BTC, мы, вероятно, продолжим снижение в третьем квартале.
$OTHERS.D Линейный график $OTHERS.D Котировки достигли минимума в четвертом квартале 2025 года, и, как я говорил тогда, альткоины по отношению к $BTC вошли в многолетний восходящий тренд 📈 У нас есть все необходимое: мощная бычья дивергенция на гистограмме, бычий крест на MACD и самый низкий уровень настроений. Люди еще не осознают этого, но мы уже несколько месяцев находимся в самом большом бычьем тренде альткоино…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @biglan_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Biglan.ru🎈 Криптовалюта, закрытая аналитика, новости, графика и прогнозы” (@biglan_ru), 137 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biglan_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.