Channel
@bigdaddydarkk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003844418449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bigdaddydarkk |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 13 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bigdaddydarkk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 19 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 20 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 19 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 21 | 41.2% | |
| 🌚 | 12 | 23.5% | |
| 👾 | 9 | 17.6% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 17.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
здравствуйте,дорогие мои птенчики. извиняюсь за долгое отсутствие,были неотложные дела,но сейчас я полностью ваш. на досуге с ребятами придумали некую забавную вещь,надо было картинками описать одного из жителей дома. всего было 5 критериев:цвет,растение,жанр,хобби,животное. желаю удачи отдать,кого же я загадал))😌
👾6🍓2
здравствуйте!! всё прекрасно,у вас как? самочувствие лучше всех,только колено ноет. вы как? не болеете? готовлюсь отойти ко сну,а вы? хм,даже не знаю,точно не стервятник
🍓5
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! <☣︎>~Здравстуйте-здравствуйте-Здравствуйте! Как у вас дела? Как самочувствие? Что делаете? С каким животным ты себя мог бы ассоциировать? 😛 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
🍓2
#срыжимнегеи
🍓4
Photo, posted without a caption
🌚2🍓2
.. Если Стервятник предлагает засунуть мне трость в ж является ли это основанием его засосать?
🍓3
король пики. не знаю почему,для меня он властный и справедливый,ещё сексуальный😌
💘1
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! С какой мастью и игральной картой вы себя ассоциируете? Почему именно эта карта? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
💘1
конечно,я шанель шмарбелин
🌚4
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! А ваша кличка «Стервятник» от слова «стерва»? 👀 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
👾1
я не считаю себя хорошим,но и плохим тоже. что-то между
🍓2
💬 У тебя новое сообщение! Папа Стервятник, вот ты недавно отвечал на вопрос "кто такой хороший вожак". А себя хорошим вожаком ты считаешь? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bigdaddydarkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“гнездо стервятника” (@bigdaddydarkk), 19 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigdaddydarkk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.