Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Профессор Балашов by Roirate

Channel

Профессор Балашов by Roirate

@big_product

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

234subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001826725480
TypeChannel
Username@big_product
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/big_product

Growth

23411 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 234 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:22 — 234 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:1712 Aug 2026, 03:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:22234no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:17234first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 234 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 January 202610 August 2026)
Views total201
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2129.6%
2028.2%
👍1419.7%
😁79.86%
❤‍🔥57.04%
👏22.82%
🤝11.41%
🥰11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Знакомый полгода переплачивал за подписку. Сервис цены не поднимал. Просто знакомый ни разу не нажал «Отменить». У сервисов по подписке есть тариф, который никогда не покажут лояльному. Он спрятан за кнопкой выхода. Я проверил это сам. Отменил Premium в одном сервисе - мне тут же предложили следующий месяц бесплатно. В другом внезапно нашлась цена 199 рублей вместо 449. В третьем всплыл месяц за 1 рубль. Не баг. Б

1

7 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Everything is seed Аарон Харрис, бывший партнер YC, написал любопытное эссе про то, почему привычные критерии оценки стартапов перестали работать, и на что инвесторам теперь смотреть сегодня? Вывод получился не новым, но как автор к этому умозаключению пришел - интересно 🙂 Я с этой точки зрения раньше не смотрел. Читайте ниже: "Еще совсем недавно венчурный рынок был устроен довольно понятно: сначала компания подн

🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Джони Айв не откликается на вакансии в хедхантере. Это очевидно? Очевидно. Но компания выложила вакансию "Superstar Product Designer" с формулировкой "ищем Джони Айва мира мобильных приложений". И получила 230 откликов. 230 человек, которые либо не читают текст вакансии, либо считают себя Джони Айвом, либо бьют по всем кнопкам подряд как по слот-машине. Где же тогда 230 Apple в нашей стране? Парадокс найма: компан

3

27 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Когда у бренда случается кризис, все смотрят на соцсети и думают: «боже, нас ненавидят». Но если присмотреться, оказывается, что ненавидят по-разному. И это важно. Исследование проанализировало 77 кризисов на страницах 39 брендов в Facebook. Выяснилась забавная штука: реакция зависит не от серьёзности проблемы, а от того, кто пишет и какой у него опыт с брендом. Новые клиенты кричат на эмоциях. Лояльные - на принци

1

17 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

На днях попалась вакансия Product Operations менеджера. Новая специализация, отпочковалась от продакт-менеджмента, потому что "система усложнилась и нужен отдельный контур управления". Книга Мелиссы Перри вышла три года назад, и вот уже кто-то готов нанять человека, чтобы тот "выявлял узкие места" и "внедрял единые стандарты". Звучит логично. Пока не дочитаешь до мелкого шрифта. ProdOps по концепции отвечает за эфф

👍21

13 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

У каждого директора была такая встреча. Каждую вторник в девять утра собирались топы, и иногда ооочень не хотелось идти. Некоторые шли. А некоторые «болели». Оказывается у этого «болел» есть научное название. Абсентеизм. Абсентеизм - это систематическое уклонение сотрудника от работы. Явный вариант: прогулы и опоздания. Скрытый: долгие перекуры, «витание в облаках» на рабочем месте, открытие Jira и полное отсутстви

2👍1

7 Jul 2026, 21:24 UTC140 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я недавно провел маленький эксперимент. Спросил у десяти человек из своей команды: «Как ты пользуешься нашим продуктом? Опиши свой типичный день». Потом посмотрел в аналитику. Совпало ровно ничего. Люди не лгут сознательно. Они рассказывают историю о себе, которую сами себе придумали. Это не баг фича. Это работает так: когда ты спрашиваешь человека «что тебе нужно», он даёт ответ, который выглядит разумным. Потому

1🔥1

23 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC178 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Как выглядит путь к $1B? Endeavor Insight изучили путь 200 фаундеров юникорнов и развенчали часть популярных мифов о том, каким должен быть основатель миллиардной компании. Миф №1: успешный фаундер – это молодой колледж-дропаут, начинавший в гараже В среднем проходит 10 лет с момента окончания бакалавриата до запуска юникорна. И еще 5-6 лет, чтобы приблизиться к $1B. Итого ~15-16 лет после выпуска до статуса «фаунде

🔥4

2 May 2026, 18:44 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Профессор Балашов by Roirate»

8 Apr 2026, 17:14 UTC364 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Идея, связанная с технологическими революциями. Сегодняшняя волна: - цифровизация - искусственный интеллект - автоматизация Мы, вероятно, находимся в середине новой «шумпетерианской волны» Итог Шумпетер фактически предсказал логику цифровой экономики: - инновации vs стабильность - разрушение vs сохранение - предприниматели vs бюрократия/паразиты - технологии vs традиционные ресурсы​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Полезные цитат

🔥4❤‍🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @big_product. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,109,365 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Профессор Балашов by Roirate” (@big_product), 234 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/big_product.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.