Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БОЛЬШАЯ РАЗНИЦА

Channel

БОЛЬШАЯ РАЗНИЦА

@big_dogmatic_difference

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003964177099
TypeChannel
Username@big_dogmatic_difference
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 16 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/big_dogmatic_difference

Growth

7678777 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers22 August 2026 — 77 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78 subscribers7 September 2026 — 77 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 12:1677-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:2378+1
22 Aug 2026, 10:2777+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:4676no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:0376first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍555.6%
💯333.3%
111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC198 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

НЕ ВСЕ РАННИЕ ХРИСТИАНЕ ВЕРИЛИ В БОЖЕ-ТЬ ИИСУСА ХРИСТА| А. Десницкий Российский библеист Андрей Десницкий признаёт факт, что не все ранние христиане верили в божест-ть Христа. #ранние_христиане #божественность_христа

👍4

26 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

РАННИЕ ХРИСТИАНЕ НЕ МОЛИЛИСЬ ИИСУСУ ХРИСТУ, МОЛИЛИСЬ ТОЛЬКО БОГУ ОТЦУ ! Православные священнослудителя свидетельствуют, что ранние христиане не молились и не обращались к Иисусу Христу. Все их молитвы были обращены только к Богу Отцу(и даже не Святому Духу). #ранние_христиане #молтва_богу

26 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC69 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

НИКТО В Н.З.. НЕ МОЛИТСЯ ИИСУСУ ХРИСТУ | А. В. Кураев* Православный апологет А. Кураев* задаётся вопросом: "Почему никто в Новом Завете не молится Иисусу Христу?" *признан иноагентом в Р.Ф. #молитва_иисусу #ранние_христианем

26 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC54 viewsread 9 August 2026

ОРИГЕН ЗАПРЕЩАЛ ОБРАЩАТЬСЯ К ИИСУСУ ХРИСТУ С МОЛИТВАМИ https://telegra.ph/ORIGEN-ZAPRESHCHAL-OBRASHCHATSYA-K-IISUSU-HRISTU-S-MOLITVAMI-11-28 #Ориген #субординационализм

26 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026

РАННИЕ ХРИСТИАНЕ НЕ МОЛИЛИСЬ ИИСУСУ ХРИСТУ Один важный и неприятный факт для современных тринитариев: Ранние христиане не молились Иисусу Христу ❗️ Подробней 👇

18 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ПРОМЕЖУТОЧНЫЕ ВЫВОДЫ Православный свящ-к Кирилл Иванов попытался дать ответ на вопрос исламского апологета Мухаммада Хиджаба "Приведите мне одного человека из первых трёх веков церковной истории, которые подробно рассказывал о: соравных, совечных и не слитых Отце, Сыне и Святом Духе. Приведите." Богословы/ранние апологеты на которых ссылался свящ-к не разделяли его тринитарных убеждений, они все были субординацион

💯31👍1

17 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

ВСЯ АПОЛОГЕТИКА АРТЕМА ФАЛЬШЬ, БРЕХНЯ | свящ. А. Рубский Православный священник дает характеристику апологетической деятельности Артема Григоряна. #чушь_григоряна

17 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC90 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

АРТЕМИЙ МИЛАШКА, КОГДА ВКЛЮЧАЕТ ЛИБЕРАЛА| свящ. В. Рубский Православный свящ. Вячеслав Рубский обвиняет в лицемерие, правосл-го апологета Артемия Григоряна. #лицемерие_григоряна

17 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC89 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

АНТИТРИНИТАРНЫЕ УТВЕРЖДЕНИЯ АРТЕМИЯ ГРИГОРЯНА Православный апологет Артемий Григорян высказывает антитринитарные утверждения. #григорян #антитринитаризм

17 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC63 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ОПРАВДАНИЯ АРТЕМИЯ ГРИГОРЯНА Православный апологет Артемий Григорян после публикации его слов на Правда или, обвинил мусульман в искажение его слов. Однако, Артемий не учёл, что помимо субординационизма, он высказал ещё несколько антитринитарных утверждений. 👇

16 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC65 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ПОВТОРНАЯ ССЫЛКА НА ИРИНЕЯ ЛИОНСКОГО Свящ-к Кирилл в шортс повторил ссылку на Иринея Лионского, пытаясь скрыть его субординационизм. #ириней_лионский

16 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC70 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Переход на личности: "Посрамление...секты Шабайкина"(с) #переходы #оскорбления

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @big_dogmatic_difference. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БОЛЬШАЯ РАЗНИЦА” (@big_dogmatic_difference), 77 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/big_dogmatic_difference.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.