Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

берти боже где я

@biboberti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

130subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778726667
TypeChannel
Username@biboberti
Descriptionсиндром нейроотличника
Created28 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/biboberti

Growth

1307 Aug 2026, 19:47 — 130 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 130 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:479 Aug 2026, 01:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:16130no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:47130first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.3%
avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.2
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total731
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,770
Videos
198
Links
245

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6342.6%
❤‍🔥2416.2%
💘1812.2%
🦄1812.2%
🔥138.78%
🌚85.41%
🎃42.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC54 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ли сказала, что это отсылка на седьмую печать, я говорю, что это внезапные арлекины из формулы любви, ли говорит, что внезапные арлекины это тоже отсылка на седьмую печать на тиля уленшпигеля очень хочется #побегное

7❤‍🔥2💘2

8 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

а это в целом моя лебединая песня визуальных мыслей, мне кажется,, очень рада, что на третий год дошла до ярких цветов на фотосессии #побегное

6💘2❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC54 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

этот сезон, по ощущениям снял старую кожу с моего сердца и потихоньку отращивает новую, хочу верить, что она не станет черствее,, сейчас я заново учусь чувствовать и видеть, у меня есть силы и образы, которые, мне казалось, потухли где-то осенью 23 года и люди хорошие, и солнце закатное и небо синее-синее! #побегное

9❤‍🔥3💘2

8 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC36 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

хихи-хаха #побегное

🌚3🦄2💘1

8 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC37 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

несколько машин назад нас подобрал товарищ, на все спасибо отвечавший: «спасибо господу нашему иисусу христу» сейчас едем под мантры с кришнаитом #побегное

❤‍🔥7

8 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

в полях убирают лук #побегное

🦄3

7 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC53 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

и самое главное — три беспрерывных дня помощи в рождении наших чудесных стариков и ветеранов после общих мероприятий прошли,, все живы, кажется, даже довольны штуками, я побесилась над разработкой этих штук, отыграла, наконец-то в полной мере табаки (мы с магом-сфинксом два часа шутили про ручки и ножки, короче нашей клетке мозга хлопаю стоя), посвятила с остальными товарищами читавшими бойцов в лор дома в котором (п

❤‍🔥7💘31🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC53 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ещё у нас было самое приятное мероприятие от кандидатов за последние три года, когда я его не разгоняю, а участвую, я побесилась как в последний раз, у нас был очень нишевый экспиренс с данькой, короче все хорошо!! завтра в архыз газуем

🦄7❤‍🔥3💘31

7 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @neuralmachine

Я сделаю все, чтобы довести вас до психического расстройства, ребята.

🌚5💘1

7 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC53 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

мы сделали, как мне кажется, самую красивую в плане визуала фотосессию на сезоне из всех, которые я делала,, мне Очень нравится уже сейчас, на моменте просмотра исходников и у себя и у других людей!!

🔥11❤‍🔥1💘1

2 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC92 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

нас откормили пирогами, мы умираем #побегное

10🎃4💘3

2 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC96 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

повидло на лекциях про автостоп: никогда не садитесь в машину, если не знаете, куда она едет, не называйте свой пункт назначения первыми повидло на практике: #побегное

17🦄6

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @biboberti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,281,090 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“берти боже где я” (@biboberti), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biboberti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.