Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BI-БИТВА

@bibattle4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

589subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002094678289
TypeChannel
Username@bibattle4
DescriptionЭкспертная конференция о том, как BI и искусственный интеллект меняют государственное управление, аналитику и принятие решений на основе первичных данных
Created7 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bibattle4

Growth

5897 Aug 2026, 11:47 — 589 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:18 — 589 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:478 Aug 2026, 03:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 588–590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:18589no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:47589first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.0%
avg views ÷ 589 subscribers
Avg views / post
271
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held17 (27 November 202529 July 2026)
Views total271
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
120
Videos
4
Links
50

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9353.8%
4023.1%
👍2715.6%
👏63.47%
42.31%
😍31.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC271 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔥 Битва BI возвращается. И в этот раз - Время AI 30 сентября в Координационном центре Правительства РФ пройдет конференция «Битва BI: Время AI» для тех, кто решает, каким будет управление на основе данных в государственном секторе. Ключевые вопросы: • Исчезнут ли дашборды, а диалог с ИИ станет новым интерфейсом для принятия государственных решений? • Кто будет готовить государственную аналитику: аналитик, госслужа

🔥933😍1

22 Jun 2026, 14:14 UTC636 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, добрый день! 🟪На площадке Координационного центра Правительства Российской Федерации 12 ноября состоится третья конференция по теме сбора и анализа обратной связи от граждан. Команда Координационного центра приглашает вас принять участие – в качестве гостей или спикеров и подробно обсудить ключевые вопросы развития отрасли. ⤵️В программе три сессии: 🟣Пленарная сессия: Как можно одной цифрой описать сложн

5🔥4

22 Dec 2025, 11:03 UTC≈2,970 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Состоялась 3-я ежегодная конференция «Битва BI 3.0: масштабирование в регионы» 🔥12 декабря 2025 года в Координационном центре Правительства состоялась 3-я ежегодная конференция «Битва BI 3.0: масштабирование в регионы», посвященная управлению на основе данных в государственном секторе и использованию отечественных BI-систем. Главная задача конференции — обмен опытом в решении региональных инцидентов и реализации выд

🔥6👍32👏2

16 Dec 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,030 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как это было 🖇 Коллеги, делимся ссылкой на фотографии с конференции.

🔥96👏4

12 Dec 2025, 16:50 UTC≈1,010 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✔️ Друзья, вот и прошла наша нетворкинг-конференция «Битва BI 3.0: масштабирование в регионы», собравшая более 100 участников из 45 регионов! 🔥 Все участники обменялись ценнейшим опытом в сфере управления на основе данных в госсекторе и применения отечественных BI-систем. Кроме того, мы получили интересные предложения о сотрудничестве по проекту «Масштабирование КЦ в регионы». 🤝Мы искренне благодарим каждого участн

👍13🔥9

12 Dec 2025, 13:40 UTC799 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6🔥4😍1

12 Dec 2025, 13:40 UTC768 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️Мы обещали — мы сделали! Участница конференции из Санкт-Петербурга поделилась с нами впечатлениями от мероприятия и нетворкинг-сессии.👍 Телефон полон заметок и комментариев, которые совершенно точно буду использовать дальше в работе

🔥61😍1

12 Dec 2025, 11:17 UTC731 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Best of the best Стартуем на нетворкинг! 🕺

🔥126

12 Dec 2025, 07:59 UTC659 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вы сегодня с нами?

  1. На площадке 🏠64%
  2. По ВКС 📹36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍31🔥1

12 Dec 2025, 07:58 UTC671 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3

12 Dec 2025, 07:58 UTC647 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Коллеги, мы начинаем нашу конференцию! 🔥

🔥6👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bibattle4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Dec 2025, 07:59 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Вы сегодня с нами?

  1. На площадке 🏠64%
  2. По ВКС 📹36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 682,474 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BI-БИТВА” (@bibattle4), 589 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bibattle4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.