Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Биба и Боба люто дедлайнят✍️

@bibabobacos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639120173
TypeChannel
Username@bibabobacos
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bibabobacos

Growth

1837 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 183 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:02 — 183 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:017 Aug 2026, 08:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:02183no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:01183first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
114.0%
avg views ÷ 183 subscribers
Avg views / post
209
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,128
Reactions total196
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,060
Videos
82
Links
58

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53167942998100626403718.9%
custom 53192891475280620203316.8%
🍓3015.3%
💯2512.8%
🔥2211.2%
🫡84.08%
👍73.57%
🤩73.57%
🤨63.06%
custom 531448044630888651252.55%
🥰52.55%
custom 537768824305354391042.04%
😢31.53%
🗿21.02%
🍌10.51%
🥴10.51%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC178 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Как только я стану королем, я сделаю заявление – я объявлю себя рок-звездой!⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Пошел последний месяц лета, а у нас по сути оно только началось :'D Как вы проводите свои летние деньки?? 📸 : Кавора

🔥14custom 53167942998100626407🍓3

Signed Sou

29 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC135 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы почти собрали тот же состав персонажей, что был в гранде! Осталось дособирать пауков👀 Фотос сдвинулся на октябрь, так что есть даже чуть больше времени на всё!

🤩7🍓1

Signed Кавора

28 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC131 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну-ка признавайтесь у кого олдскулы свело? Или тут у нас собрались зумеры (как я), которые в годы трансляции Шаман Кинга по тв ПОД СТОЛ ХОДИЛИ

custom 531928914752806202013🍓1

Signed Sou

28 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC115 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На первой фотке произошло единение Вторая просто секси, Хихока постарался

custom 531679429981006264018🍓3

Signed Sou

24 Jul 2026, 04:53 UTC178 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возможно, стоило запостить это в виде статьи, но я пенсионер, придется потерпеть🙃

🥰5custom 53776882430535439104🍓3

Signed Кавора

24 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC173 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

К чему я это всё. Ну вышло как вышло. Да, местами кринжанули, такое бывает! Начало сцены пауков объективно не оч было, но Куроро наш не растерялся, обыграл и отыграл свою роль, а дальше пауки вышли прям очень хорошо. У Кайто коса сломалась, ну тоже бывает (вапсета это сцена боя, все дела), тоже не растерялись с Питу, допрыгали свою боевку. Самое важное - все ребята были максимально втипажные и отыгрывали своих персон

💯9custom 53192891475280620205👍2🍓1😢1

Signed Кавора

24 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC127 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Будет простыня, готовьтесь. Мне прямо-таки ОЧЕНЬ не хотелось продолжать тему нашего гранда по Хантеру, уже как будто обсудили все со своими же ребятами, но за прошедшее с прошлой пятницы время я собрала целый пак приколдесов о "херовой безответственной организации". В лицо после выступления мне никто из самых недовольных ничего не сказал, зато кой-чего разошлось по общим (кек) знакомым, по своим канальчикам и, конечн

💯5custom 53192891475280620205👍2🍓1🥴1😢1

Signed Кавора

24 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC146 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну и в-четвертых, ГЕНРЕПА. У меня буквально опустились руки, когда мы начали прогон и поняли, что часть людей просто ничего не знает. Видео репетиции было и отдельное по аркам, и склеенное. В итоге мы тратим время на изучение хоряжки заново. Нет, я понимаю, что может быть сложно сориентироваться, может быть непонятно... Но как будто бы можно написать, что не разобрались, попросить переснять. Хорошо, что в итоге, все

💯8custom 53192891475280620206👍3🍓2🍌1😢1

Signed Кавора

23 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC298 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итак, друзья, поиска пост! СПб, либо возможность приехать. На фотосет по Хантеру ищем недостающих персонажей! Фотос планируется в формате фанатского календаря+несколько доп.кадров. Занятые персонажи зачеркнуты на коллажах Концепт: Парные/групповые кадры на циклораме с цветными фильтрами и дымом По ценнику: ~10к за фотографа+студия на 3 часа. (Делится на всех участников) По дате: вторая половина сентября, конкретную

custom 53144804463088865125🍓2custom 53192891475280620202custom 53167942998100626401

Signed Кавора

22 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC169 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати. Вот шутки шутками, но у нас с Соу в плане выступлений настолько один мозг на двоих, что в воскресенье мы ОБЕ забыли движения в начале нашего дефиле, и ОБЕ сделали какие-то другие движения ОДИНАКОВО. Мы стояли спинами))))

🔥8🍓1

Signed Кавора

22 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC182 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Питер, розыск

🍓1custom 53167942998100626401

Signed Sou

22 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC185 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто-то из гримёрки грандов, похоже, увёл парик на леорио🫡 не знаю, кому нужна прическа Антонио Бандераса, но у себя я его не обнаружила....

🤨6🍓1

Signed Sou

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @bibabobacos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 172,209 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Биба и Боба люто дедлайнят✍️” (@bibabobacos), 183 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bibabobacos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.