Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚大事件曝光-博彩BC黑台

Channel

东南亚大事件曝光-博彩BC黑台

@bgtfp

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

173,360subscribers

+41,153 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002008337420
TypeChannel
Username@bgtfp
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bgtfp

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@chigua8198/831429 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC@bgtfp/8186 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@bgtfp/8444 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC@chigua8198/836031 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@bgtfp/8754 · this entry3 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC@chigua8198/84473 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC1.00under a minute
@bgtfp/8772 · this entry4 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC@chigua8198/84654 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@bgtfp/8866 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 10:33 UTC@chigua8198/85537 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC1.0032 minutes
@chigua8198/883024 Sept 2026, 05:17 UTC@bgtfp/9204 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 05:17 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@chigua819823 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (16–7)
@bbsooo6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0089 minutes@bbsooo (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 11 of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,228 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

132,207181,167156,687173,3607 August 202610 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 95 days, net +41,153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124,863–188,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:37173,360-562
8 Nov 2026, 15:51173,922-809
7 Nov 2026, 09:26174,731-471
6 Nov 2026, 10:19175,202-418
5 Nov 2026, 10:01175,620-88
4 Nov 2026, 09:09175,708+22
3 Nov 2026, 07:59175,686-748
2 Nov 2026, 08:06176,434+2
1 Nov 2026, 10:09176,432+106
31 Oct 2026, 06:35176,326-406
30 Oct 2026, 05:17176,732-348
29 Oct 2026, 08:26177,080-874
28 Oct 2026, 04:17177,954-435
27 Oct 2026, 03:29178,389-54
26 Oct 2026, 06:46178,443-91
25 Oct 2026, 09:00178,534-55
24 Oct 2026, 05:47178,589-883
23 Oct 2026, 02:45179,472-1,186
22 Oct 2026, 00:28180,658-256
20 Oct 2026, 16:07180,914first reading

Engagement

1,394 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 199 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.06%
avg views ÷ 173,360 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,300
380 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.339%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
380
of 1,394 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 349 of 380 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held1,394 (7 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total2,013,072
Reactions total6,276
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 182 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,682 reactions across 915 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,47816.9%
🔥2,38316.2%
❤2,09614.3%
🎉2,01613.7%
👏1,97213.4%
🤩1,86812.7%
🥰1,65111.2%
❤‍🔥850.579%
💯650.443%
😍560.381%
⚡60.041%
😁60.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 916 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,682 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 380 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

黄仁勋承认婚外情 英伟达启动独立调查 英伟达首席执行官黄仁勋11月8日向员工发信承认对妻子不忠,称“我的行为伤害了她和孩子们,我对此深表歉意”,并表示对自身行为及造成的伤害承担全部责任。此前有报道称他与被美方指认为中国间谍的Alice Huang存在关系,黄仁勋在信中未提及对方姓名。英伟达同日宣布,董事会已启动独立调查,由独立董事委员会在外部法律顾问协助下审查有关其CEO遭外国情报行动针对的报道。公司称无理由认为公司机密或美国国家安全受损。中国外交部发言人郭嘉昆11月9日再次否认相关间谍指控,称其“毫无根据”。事件导致英伟达股价在周一盘后交易中下跌。

❤1👍1

10 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC325 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

金边Golden Street市场疑似存在非法赌博场所,被指昼夜营业 柬埔寨金边市桑园区(Chamkar Mon)东奔萨克分区(Tonle Bassac)的 Golden Street 市场内,一处涉嫌非法经营的赌博场所被当地媒体曝光。据称,该场所长期开展现金下注赌博活动,即使当地执法部门持续开展打击非法赌博行动,相关活动仍疑似照常进行。 事件详情: 地点: 金边市桑园区东奔萨克分区,Golden Street市场(The Bridge大楼正对面)。 涉嫌活动: 现金下注赌博,据称昼夜营业。 经营人员: 有知情人士声称,场所老板为一名绰号“特”的中国籍男子,另有一名叫Rathana的人员负责看场或提供保护。 官方回应: 11月9日下午,媒体曾尝试联系桑园区警察局局长了解情况,但未能取得回应。 当地媒体表示,将继续追踪调查此事,并要求有关部门核实场所是否涉及非法赌博经营,以及是否存在监管不到位的问题。

🔥4👍3❤1

10 Nov 2026, 05:04 UTC≈5,560 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

AI需求推高成本 印度电子企业面临电路板供应压力 据媒体报道,全球印刷电路板制造商正将更多产能转向人工智能应用所需的高端专业化产品,导致印度传统电子行业用户受到冲击。印度电子制造商目前面临印刷电路板成本上升和供应受限的问题,材料价格涨幅最高达350%,影响正向客户传导。报道称,人工智能相关硬件需求的快速增长是产能被大量占用的主要原因。

🤩1

9 Nov 2026, 19:08 UTC≈9,900 views36 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#最新消息:10月底西港“星汇海景湾”抓的那批中国同胞这2天都要送去金边了,基本处理不了。 这几天警察局里面都空了,接下来又会出门去炸街抓人进去,西港局势越来越严峻,几个国家暗地调查也在继续,同胞们保护好自己~ 现在就是狗推抓完了就开始抓这些鸡店,大概要把今年抓完才会结束的,目前柬埔寨的确是没办法呆了。建议大家先回国把年过了再考虑出来吧。

🎉18👏16🥰2

9 Nov 2026, 15:36 UTC≈10,300 views72 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

坐牢何尝不是种重生,蹲个几年出来,日子照样过。

🔥32👏21🎉19

9 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC≈9,630 views57 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:前几天星汇抓的同胞明天都要送金边了,基本处理不了。 这几天里面空了,接下来又会去搜刮安排人进去,西港局势越来越严峻,几个国家暗地调查也在继续,同胞们保护好自己~

👏25❤18🎉14

9 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC≈9,400 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

东盟秘书长为第11届东盟青年企业家嘉年华致辞 东盟秘书长高金洪博士在第11届东盟青年企业家嘉年华上发表预录致辞。活动在菲律宾马尼拉举行,主题为“携手引领东盟未来:青年企业家共促全民繁荣”。高金洪在致辞中表达了对活动的支持。

🤩17👍15🎉13

9 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,490 views40 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

越南公安部高官之女伦敦奢华生活引发争议,名牌珠宝及家庭背景遭网民质疑 据相关网络报道,范玉芳草(Phạm Ngọc Phương Thảo)被指是越南公安部副部长范世松(Phạm Thế Tùng)的女儿。其社交媒体上发布的生活照片显示,她经常展示名牌服饰、奢侈手袋、昂贵珠宝及腕表,同时也曾分享与父亲的合影。 相关照片在越南社交平台传播后,引起不少网民关注和讨论。 部分网民对其奢华生活提出质疑,尤其关注其财富来源,以及其家庭背景与生活水平之间的关系。由于普通民众面临生活成本压力,这些照片也进一步引发了关于官员家庭财富透明度的讨论。 此外,还有网络消息称,部分对事件发表评论、进行讽刺或批评的网民,疑似受到威胁或施压。不过,关于警方是否直接介入,目前尚缺乏独立证据证实。 截至目前,相关争议仍在网络持续发酵。范玉芳草及其家人是否就财富来源和相关质疑作出正式回应,仍有待进一步关注。

❤15🔥13🤩12

9 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC324 views22 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

印尼青年传播奖学金在泗水培训数字素养 30名来自12个省份的青年参加2026年印尼青年传播奖学金(IYCF)项目,于11月5日至8日在泗水接受为期四天的传播与数字素养培训。该项目由印尼青年外交组织(IYD)主办、英国政府支持,学员背景包括内容创作者、教师、社会活动人士和私营部门员工。培训设七场强化课程,由英国传播培训师指导,内容涵盖传播策略制定、材料编排到内容制作。学员还参加“泗水版城市对话”,讨论防范学生群体中的虚假信息、评估数字素养,以及将泗水建设为兼顾当地文化的以人为本智慧城市。IYD主席M. Syaeful Mujab表示,希望学员以“泗水勇敢”精神打击虚假信息。泗水市长专家 staff Bisukma Kurniawati 代表市政府出席,强调技术进步需与青年品格并重。项目还包括城市历史导览、与志奋领校友交流及面向公众的数字公民责任研讨会。泗水阶段结束后,学员将进入自主内容制作阶段,项目第二阶段定于2027年初在日惹…

🎉9❤7👍6

9 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC156 views23 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

#吃瓜:自从黄仁勋出轨风波被传得沸沸扬扬以后,网上的小短剧就跟不要钱似的,一部接一部地往外冒。 从黄仁勋各种版本的出轨剧情,到马斯克持枪抓奸、现场直接火力压制,编剧们的脑洞已经彻底放飞了。 现在这年头,AI还没把人类淘汰,短视频编剧倒是先把好莱坞给淘汰了。 建议各位导演别藏着了,下一部直接安排《硅谷风云之董事会抓奸》,主演:黄仁勋、马斯克,友情出演:双黄连。

🤩9👏8👍6

9 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC≈4,890 views17 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

越南胡志明警方打掉一股票盘 十几个中国狗推悉数被抓 这个中国狗推在越南公安面前 表情实在放松,又很释然 似乎还想来一句: 公安同志,你看得明白吗?

🔥9👍4👏4

9 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC83 views19 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

极端天气袭击八个阿拉伯国家 造成人员伤亡 据半岛电视台报道,暴雨、山洪和强风近日在多个阿拉伯国家造成大范围破坏,并导致人员死亡和财产损失。受灾范围从沙姆地区、阿拉伯半岛延伸至北非,各国强度不一。部分地区遭遇伴雷电的强降雨,引发山洪,道路被淹,低洼地带积水;强风还扰乱了航运活动。多国气象部门警告降雨、强风和降温可能持续,预计该地区自周日(9日)起将再次受到低压系统影响。在加沙地带,自周五夜间起的恶劣天气带来强降雨,导致数万顶难民帐篷被淹,进一步加剧了难民的困境。

🔥8🎉6👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,394 posts we hold for @bgtfp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @bgtfp as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚大事件曝光-博彩BC黑台” (@bgtfp), 173,360 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bgtfp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.