Без лишнего блеска pinned a photo

Channel
Без лишнего блеска
@bezlishnegobleska
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,374subscribers
+8,965 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001869241750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bezlishnegobleska |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bezlishnegobleska |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:20 | 13,374 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:05 | 13,382 | -9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:45 | 13,391 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 13,393 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:28 | 13,405 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 13,412 | +1,042 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:58 | 12,370 | +1,338 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 11,032 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 11,040 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:35 | 11,059 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 11,070 | +923 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 10,147 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 10,155 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 10,165 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 10,174 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:36 | 10,186 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:09 | 10,188 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 10,191 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 10,189 | -10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 10,199 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.48%
- avg views ÷ 13,374 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 599
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (22 July 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,591 |
| Reactions total | 464 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
819 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 352 | 43.0% | |
| ❤ | 324 | 39.6% | |
| 🥰 | 67 | 8.18% | |
| 🕊 | 35 | 4.27% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 3.17% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 819 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Наконец-то добрались руки до моих парфюмерных отливантов от Марии 🖤 В этот раз набрала сразу шесть совершенно разных ароматов - от сочного цитрусового до уютной ванили. Делюсь впечатлениями! Juliette Has A Gun Magnolia Bliss Очень приятная, солнечная магнолия с фруктовой сочностью. В начале много свежего цитруса, потом появляется нежная цветочность и немного сладковатая фруктовая нота. Лёгкий, ненавязчивый и очень…
👏36🥰6💯5🍓3
Без лишнего блеска pinned a photo
Без лишнего блеска pinned a photo
не знала, что у Diptique есть такая штучка но! диффузор песочные часы очень прикольно взять на подарок, для тех, кто любит все для дома покупаешь рефилы, переворачиваешь и мембрана по средине пропитывается ароматом и вуаля💫 он рассчитан на небольшие помещения до 20 м²
👏58❤54🥰14
В периоды сильного стресса волосы иногда преподносят не самые приятные сюрпризы.. Усиленное выпадение, потеря привычной густоты - знакомая многим история. Поэтому решила попробовать комплексный уход System 4 в красном оформлении, который предназначен для ухода за волосами, склонными к выпадению ❤️ В набор входят три средства, которые дополняют друг друга. Первое — маска-пилинг для кожи головы. Очень интересный эта…
❤31👏29🕊10
новая хотелка! Maison Margiela и NUDAKE дропнули новую коллекцию посуды 💔
👏30❤29🕊12🥰5
Купила помаду в фиолетовом футляре Dries Van Noten и здесь есть крем для тела с запахом как мои любимые духи сейчас, честно, пахнет ещё лучше чем духи ♥️🙏 Soie Malaquais eau de parfum
❤37👏34🕊8💯1
Интересная инициатива: легализовать продажу красивых автономеров и направлять деньги от сделок в бюджет. Такой рынок уже существует, но во многом остаётся в тени. Например, номер А888АА продавали за 26 млн рублей. Огромные деньги, которые сейчас могут оседать у посредников вместо того, чтобы пополнять бюджет. И возникает логичный вопрос: зачем постоянно повышать налоги и штрафы, если можно легализовать уже существу…
👏29❤24🥰6💯3
Сегодня есть место на рекламу личного блога, запись @mamorami 🩷🩷
Без лишнего блеска pinned a photo
Поднимаю себе настроение яркими образами и мелкими покупками. Ну и сладеньким конечно !! П. с: вообще разлюбила сырники, готовлю только для своих ребят, потому что они их прям обожают. А что у вас сегодня на завтрак? 🧇
👏28❤20🥰9🍓7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bezlishnegobleska. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @bezlishnegobleska as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 3
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@valerika_photobeauty · 25,881
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
@with_meaninggg · 23,016
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 October 2026
@darinaS20022 · 30,026
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
@pobednovabeauty · 11,978
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 October 2026
@mozhnorita · 32,279
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 September 2026
@lyubofka_33 · 19,306
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 September 2026
@olesyaprobeauty · 20,939
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 September 2026
@kseniaspasdiary08 · 17,014
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 September 2026
@mmilany · 24,792
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
@privet_devushka · 36,372
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
@po_sledam_esteta · 23,146
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 September 2026
@iamnotsanya · 31,367
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
@Anya_abouteverything · 24,977
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 September 2026
@YuliaNagubneva · 40,549
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@jane_koretskaya · 24,263
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 September 2026
@nodaywithoutbeauty · 28,688
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@mskateantonova · 17,854
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
@cmflmissues · 21,094
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 September 2026
@ihatehndrx · 28,029
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
@malinovue_kudri · 40,510
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 30 August 2026
@Tanyatalksabout · 44,552
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
@broilinhades · 39,141
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 August 2026
@Momentsolga · 21,508
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
@LIFEWITHANYA · 39,091
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Без лишнего блеска” (@bezlishnegobleska), 13,374 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezlishnegobleska.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.