Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бездна отвечает

@bezdwur

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

184subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398723230
TypeChannel
Username@bezdwur
DescriptionОгрызок меня Чат: https://t.me/+sEWT_SFAJegwOGRi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bezdwur

Growth

1849 Aug 2026, 16:47 — 184 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:00 — 184 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 16:479 Aug 2026, 17:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 183–185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:00184no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:47184first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.5%
avg views ÷ 184 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total927
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,120
Videos
27
Links
79

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5380001465194532462623.1%
custom 5435890173810342415623.1%
custom 5368370569202923384415.4%
custom 5228853594588990468311.5%
custom 5328114875824632015311.5%
custom 537738424526834053627.69%
custom 544964444579853085127.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54496444457985308512

8 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @moy_Appendix_v_rayuPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54358901738103424151

8 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

это не мой но тоже хороший

custom 53773842452683405361custom 54358901738103424151

8 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC68 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#рисунки

custom 52288535945889904683custom 53683705692029233843

8 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#рисунки

custom 53683705692029233841

8 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @spelllss

С появлением людей, неумолимо появилось Говно, в котором эти самые люди по воле и по неволе утопают по сей день. Это нормально, у нас на биологическом уровне установлено утопание в Говне. Все рано или поздно вступят, вопрос в том, как быстро выкарабкаются и перестанут нести за собой этот смрад. Но теоретически, если Мы все лишь восприятие чего-то извне, то почему бы нам не менять это самое восприятие, а не это вонюче

custom 53773842452683405361

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сосать вейпик на зарядке это как сосать сиську у Матери-Розетки

custom 53281148758246320153

6 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC65 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как можно проповедовать антинатализм (не будем даже заострять внимание на том, что это незаконно в РФ), чтобы тебя восприняли всерьез? Тут точно есть какая-то логическая ошибка, ведь люди любят повторять, как жестока жизнь, и что никто не обещал, что она будет лёгкой и счастливой. Почему тогда эти же самые люди вырывают своих нерожденных детей из сладких объятий не-существования, чтобы обречь на жизнь, которую назы

6 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC65 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо, не забудь в чате похвастаться что круто опустил

6 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Надеюсь тебя кей изнасилует

custom 54358901738103424154

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bezdwur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

У автора канала шиза?

  1. да9%
  2. нет17%
  3. третий, секретный вариант74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 740,501 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бездна отвечает” (@bezdwur), 184 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezdwur.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.