Channel
@bezdelca
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
819subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002082218840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bezdelca |
| Description | Канал про искусство, где на него смотрят как на сериал и обсуждают как свежую сплетню |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bezdelca |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 819 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 819 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 820 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,792 |
| Reactions total | 142 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
142 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 52.8% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 14.8% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 9.86% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.52% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.82% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.704% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.704% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#арт_психо Перепишу любовь и сочиню ее наоборот: как Рубенс создал пиар-роман До появления фотографий и видеозвонков, потенциальные жених и невеста обменивались портретами. Разумеется, это касалось только венценосных особ. И мы даже представить не можем, сколько слез было пролито и вина выпито, когда оказывалось, что из-за льстивых придворных художников ожидание драматически расходилось с реальностью. Мария Медичи…
❤7🔥7⚡1😁1
#арт_лав Дело не в тебе, дело во мне: почему часто так оно и есть Наш мозг не любит быть неправым и это может разрушить даже самые идеальные отношения. Так сказал нейробиолог, рассуждая в интервью о возникновении привязанности. Обсудив мышей и обезьян, он переключился на людей и объяснил, почему пазлы так часто не совпадают. Всему виной наши индивидуальные представления о том, «как надо». И если «сын маминой подр…
❤13👍5🤔1😁1
#арт_мэджик Неотвратимость «Греха» от Франца фон Штука 1893 год. Религия уже не кажется чем-то обязательным и незыблемым. На сцену выходит Фрейд со своей теорией сексуальности, общество ударяется в мистику, а женщины начинают расшатывать основы патриархата. Но извечные вопросы никуда не деваются: они просто обретают новое прочтение. Для немецкого символиста Франца фон Штука эта картина стала программной: с ее пом…
❤8🔥6⚡3👍1
Искусство — для всех Нравится подход автора канала об искусстве «Безделица» Кати Надровой — сегодняшней гостьи рубрики #КультурныйТелеграм. Честность и искренность в каждом тексте о выставках, произведениях и художниках.Без снобства, чем иногда грешат другие. Почему и когда ты завела Телеграм-канал? Для меня искусство — это не столько стили и эпохи, сколько смыслы и эмоции. Поэтому я против идеи, что искусство, осо…
❤10👍3🔥2⚡1🤩1
#арт_психо «Доколе?!»: почему «Забастовка балерин» вряд ли увенчается успехом Мы привыкли, что если на картине изображены балерины, то это, конечно, Дега. А вот и нет. Это полотно Николааса ван дер Ваая и оно не об изяществе и пластике танцовщиц, а об их жизни вне света софитов. Название картины прямо говорит о бунте: девушки в белоснежных пачках чем-то недовольны. Чем же? Низкой оплатой или тяжелым графиком – это…
❤14⚡5💯4👍1🔥1
#арт_высказывание Художник – это человек, создающий то, в чем у людей нет необходимости, но по какой-то причине он считает, что это следует им дать. ✍️ Энди Уорхол
❤12👍9😁3🔥2
#арт_поход Вырви глаз: II Международная биеннале «Искусство будущего» в МАММ Скажу сразу – я небольшая поклонница цифрового искусства, но стараюсь относиться к нему с пониманием. Художникам-зумерам, видимо, привычно творить, не выпуская из рук гаджеты, а взрослевшие еще в аналоговом мире миллениалы, наверное, не хотят быть сброшенными с корабля современности. Но обычному зрителю смотреть на постоянно мигающие экр…
❤11⚡4🔥3👍2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bezdelca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 821,931 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Безделица” (@bezdelca), 819 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezdelca.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.