Channel
@bez_zasvetki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001302032561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bez_zasvetki |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bez_zasvetki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:04 | 82 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 83 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 82 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 82 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
89 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 48.3% | |
| custom 5771526152707378768 | 13 | 14.6% | |
| 🦄 | 11 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5364236731899982272 | 7 | 7.87% | |
| custom 5242432198119805795 | 5 | 5.62% | |
| custom 5406904332882817188 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5330418399929454504 | 3 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5771714083296383161 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| custom 5771556410751979167 | 1 | 1.12% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Печатала автопортреты, сделанные в июле 2023 г. До сих пор считаю ту поездку на Бердскую косу самой запоминающейся. Тогда ещё и в мыслях не было, что буду печатать с негативов. Теперь вот смотрю и думаю, надо немного постобработкой заняться... Есть куда развивать навыки) #отпечатки_без_засветки
🔥10custom 53304183999294545042custom 57715261527073787682🦄1custom 53642367318999822721custom 54069043328828171881
Соглашусь, что лит на свежей бумаге не даёт той непредсказуемости и атмосферной картинки. Тем не менее результат определённо имеет глубину в точках чёрного и именно на этом кадре я это поняла #отпечатки_без_засветки
custom 57715261527073787682🦄1custom 52424321981198057951custom 53642367318999822721custom 54069043328828171881custom 57715564107519791671
Ещё мосты на панорамную камеру. 📷 SPRocket Rocket 🎞️ Lucky color 200
🔥8🦄2custom 57715261527073787682custom 53642367318999822721
📷 SPRocket Rocket 🎞️ Lucky color 200
🔥5🦄2custom 52424321981198057951custom 57715261527073787681
📷 SPRocket Rocket 🎞️ Lucky color 200 Когда много свободного времени, кажется, что всё успеешь сделать и поэтому ничего не делаешь. Когда свободного времени совершенно нет, то тоже ничего не делаешь и думаешь "вот бы мне кучу свободного времени, я бы тогда...." ♾️ Но, как показывает практика, всё же самое продуктивное время - когда "его совершенно нет" . Временной парадокс какой-то ✴️
🔥5custom 57715261527073787682🦄1custom 52424321981198057951custom 53304183999294545041custom 53642367318999822721
Был у меня недавно перерыв в основной рабочей деятельности [отпуск] , в который нужно было вместить массу дел, на которые нужно ещё и собраться с мыслями и вдохновением. В общем взяла я свой большой формат 4×5 со всей амуницией, вдовесок - панорамный узкий формат, и пошла снимать камни и деревья = медитировать. Медитировать мешала мошкара. Поэтому особого удовольствия от съёмки на БФ получить не удалось, но вот дубли…
🔥7custom 57715261527073787682🦄1custom 53642367318999822721custom 54069043328828171881
Signed v_andré
Пятигорск, вид с г. Машук. Май 2026 📷 Bronica S2a 🎞️ Lucky 400 SHD 120 Впервые попалась партия этой плёнки с такими царапинами. И есть подозрение, что засветки тоже делает не Bronica, как я думала изначально. В печать скорее всего эти кадры не подойдут, но как память пусть остаются)
🔥5🦄1custom 52424321981198057951custom 53642367318999822721custom 54069043328828171881custom 57715261527073787681custom 57717140832963831611
Signed v_andré
Это должны были быть панорамы на цветную киношку со смытым сажевым слоем. Но.... Но это и есть панорамы на цветную киношку со смытым сажевым слоем. 📷 SProcket panorama 🎞️ KV3 со смытым сажевым слоем, с засветкой, с просрочкой и множественными проходами через рентген в аэропортах
🔥3🦄2custom 52424321981198057951custom 53642367318999822721custom 57715261527073787681custom 57717140832963831611
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @bez_zasvetki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BEZ_ZASVETKI” (@bez_zasvetki), 82 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bez_zasvetki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.