4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 05:00
226
+91
2 Sept 2026, 00:34
135
-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:15
136
no change
1 Sept 2026, 17:00
136
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
57.5%
avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
Avg views / post
130
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
17 (25 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
1,040
Reactions total
133
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
238 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
97
40.8%
💘
60
25.2%
❤🔥
43
18.1%
💋
23
9.66%
🍓
15
6.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✔️ сколько нужно заниматься английским, чтобы был прогресс?
спойлер:
не обязательно заниматься каждый день по 4 часа
гораздо важнее, что именно ты делаешь за это время!
60 минут живого разговора, где ты постоянно:
➡️ формулируешь мысли
➡️ задаешь вопросы
➡️ объясняешь свою позицию
➡️ ищешь нужные слова
могут дать намного больше, чем еще один час с приложением, где ты просто нажимаешь на правильный вариант
поэт…
📚 september 1st: back to studying
новые предметы, цели, дедлайны…
после перерыва возвращаться в учебный ритм бывает непросто(( поэтому собрали несколько полезных английских фраз, которые пригодятся в начале учебного года:
1⃣to get back into a routine –вернуться в привычный учебный ритм
It’s hard to get back into a routine after the summer
2⃣to get back to studying – вернуться к учебе
I need to get back to studyin…
почему ты забываешь слова сразу после урока?
ты учишь новое слово.
выписываешь его.
смотришь перевод.
думаешь:
«все, запомнила»
через неделю:
what word was it… 😪
и это нормальноо!
🌟мозгу недостаточно просто увидеть слово один раз
ему нужно встретить его снова – и желательно использовать самому
поэтому в BETWEEN мы стараемся не оставлять новую лексику «на уроке»
сначала ты знакомишься с ней в worksheet, потом…
судя по ответам, проблемы едины(
и вот тут как раз хочется напомнить, что в BETWEEN сейчас идет набор на осенний месяц
если давно хотелось больше говорить на английском – можно просто присоединиться к группе и наконец начать! 🤩
сейчас формируем составы, поэтому если думал(а) – напиши «РАЗГОВОР» в личку @annaannicc
🏛️ Петербург – культурная столица!
ваша админка сейчас в Петербурге, so let’s talk about the city in English
если бы к вам приехал иностранный друг, what 3 places would you show them?
эрмитаж? петергоф? казанский собор? или что-то less obvious?
а вот слова, которые пригодятся, чтобы рассказать о городе:
landmark – достопримечательность
masterpiece – шедевр
cultural heritage – культурное наследие
breathtaking – з…
➡️ what makes a conversation interesting?
не идеальная грамматика.
и даже не огромный vocabulary.
an opinion.
на наших занятиях мы говорим о том, что действительно интересно обсуждать: о продуктивности, музыке и культуре, путешествиях, отношениях, технологиях – и просто о том, что происходит в жизни
здесь не нужно заранее готовиться к разговору или ждать, пока твой английский станет «достаточно хорошим»
мы учим…
🌀 busy ≠ productive
самая неприятная мысль о продуктивности:
иногда твоя занятость – просто хорошо организованная прокрастинация.
ответить на все сообщения? done.
почистить почту? done.
составить идеальный to-do list? done.
а самая важная задача все еще стоит на месте..
потому что being busy feels productive
а теперь честно:
что у тебя чаще?
“i have so much to do”
или
““I actually got important things done”?
…
сейчас вместе с дизайнером дорабатываем оформление наших будущих уроков 💻✨
стараемся сделать так, чтобы учиться было не просто полезно, но и визуально эстетично
я абсолютно влюблена в этот процесс, и мне уже безумно не терпится запустить наш осенний сезон BETWEEN!
присоединяйся к нам, пока идет набор в группы:
➡️ @annaannicc
как не зависать в разговоре на английском?
ты понимаешь вопрос, знаешь, что хочешь сказать – но мозг в этот момент:
loading…
и пока ты собираешь идеальное предложение, разговор уже ушел дальше
хорошая новость: не всегда нужно знать больше английского. иногда нужно просто иметь несколько инструментов, которые помогают держать разговор
▫️1. выиграй несколько секунд
“let me think for a second.”
“that’s a good ques…
и последнее:
что ты обычно делаешь, когда не понимаешь собеседника?
ask them to repeat56%
pretend you understood9%
wait for the context to make it clear50%
panic a little38%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @betweenEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
и последнее:
что ты обычно делаешь, когда не понимаешь собеседника?
ask them to repeat56%
pretend you understood9%
wait for the context to make it clear50%
panic a little38%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
wait until you can formulate the perfect answer15%
say what you can and figure it out as you go52%
explain it in a different way70%
translate everything in your head19%
change the topic / make a joke4%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BETWEEN” (@betweenEnglish), 226 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betweenEnglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.