2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 437–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 05:15
438
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:29
438
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Links
51
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33
64.7%
👍
10
19.6%
🔥
7
13.7%
👏
1
1.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆 BETTING BASH RESULTS 🏆
What a fight!
Max Holloway wins by KO/TKO in Round 1. Over $6000 payout, our largest yet!!💥
🎉 Winners:
Oscar
John Modelo
Rok
ropemaxxer
Iml
John Doe
12 ㅤ
Dave
D K
P DD
kevin
J Max
Brandon
Gym Hogra 👊🏼
Arthur Nudge
Russell
Shotta 609
alma jogurts
Josh
Slippa
Josh
hellprince
Adam
A B
C
Jake
Vazze Koler
Just This
Ez
Kris
Iron Ambition
Some one
Anthony S
Truman Surles
Colin
Devin J
Benjamin Br…
🥊🔒 The poll is now closed! 🔒🥊
Get ready for the showdown! Let's enjoy the fight tonight and see who takes home the prize, I'm sure Connor's gonna put on a big show, at least 😂! Thank you all for voting!
15 votes
#YLJ
L
fleryy
luis
Erick T
Slippa
M Ski
EVOBEE
Jose
Gregory Papas
zeheb merchant
Kuku
W B
Steve Tavasci
K J
These are the lucky winners of this Betting Bash! If you don't see your name on this list, please do not ask for the prize. Thank you for playing and see you next time!!
🥊🔥 THE UFC BETTING BASH IS OVER! 🔥🥊
What a turn of events! 😱
Ciryl Gane defeats Alex Pereira via 2nd Round TKO! 💥
Congratulations to everyone who picked the winner! 🏆
🎉 If you placed the correct prediction, please send Theo a private message with the email address registered on your account to claim your prize.
Thanks to everyone who participated, and stay tuned for the next Betting Bash! 👊💰
🥊🔥 BIG UFC BETTING BASH IS HERE! 🔥🥊 Alex Pereira 🆚 Ciryl Gane It doesn't get much bigger than this. Cast your vote in the poll and win up to $1,000! 🎉
public poll
Pereira by KO/TKO ($100) – 80
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 70%
Gane by KO/TKO ($120) – 15
👍 13%
Gane by Decision ($80) – 7
👍 6%
Pereira by Decision ($60) – 5
▫️ 4%
No Contest ($1000) – 5
▫️ 4%
Pereira…
🥊🔒 The poll is now closed! 🔒🥊
Get ready for the showdown! The stage is set, and the excitement is building up! Let's enjoy the fight and see who will emerge victorious! Stay tuned to witness the action unfold!
Cast your prediction in the poll for the much-anticipated UFC 324 bout between Justin Gaethje vs. Paddy Pimblett and stand to win up to $1000!
public poll
Pimblett by Submission ($100) – 35
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 43%
Gaethje by KO/TKO ($100) – 20
👍👍👍👍 24%
Pimblett by KO/TKO ($120) – 16
👍👍👍 20%
Gaethje by Decision ($60) – 5
👍 6%
Gaethje by Submission ($80) – 3
👍 4%
No Contest ($1000) – 2
▫️ 2%
Pimblett by De…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @betting_bash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@betting_bash named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@evobryvn named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@gainz411 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Steroidify Betting Bash” (@betting_bash), 438 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betting_bash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.