Photo, posted without a caption
🎉1

Channel
@bettergoods
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
611subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001450041785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bettergoods |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bettergoods |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 611 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 610 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 610 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🎉1
在ai上苹果已经落后很多了,哪怕和国内手机厂商比
#理想汽车 今天去试驾了一下理想i8,坚定了我对理想的信心。 1,vla是真的可以,对比同样试驾了的小鹏,小米。至少从销售带我试驾的体验上来说。 2,车的造型上很有特点,电车就是要和油车不一样啊,为电而生的造型。 3,虽然车很大,但开起来确实还不错,之前也试驾过L6给我感觉就是很大一台车,i8完全没有这个感觉。 4,从现场看,L系列还是卖的不错的,并没有掉的那么厉害,理想还是有一定品牌力的。
🎉1
Photo, posted without a caption
#股票 这思路真的是行
计划建仓
选择伴侣段时候,有些关键的点真的是不能马虎,比如沟通。出现问题就冷暴力,拒绝沟通,然后可能过1~2天就恢复正常了。恋爱的时候可能觉得没啥大问题 。但进入婚姻关系,如果还是持续不沟通,裂痕可能会越来远大。
会有当妈的,因为爹说错了一句话对孩子就一天不管不问吗,几个月大的宝宝。妈妈不是都很舍不得孩子吗
店里这是冰都空了?
https://youtu.be/5O5U7hE65W0?si=viBXfIwg9l3QvbYq 咱就说苹果这个广告
面对AI最焦虑地是市场部 特别耐人寻味
咱就是说,过于敏感了吧
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bettergoods. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“自言自语” (@bettergoods), 611 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bettergoods.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.