Channel
@betatransfer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
649subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001141566944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @betatransfer |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/betatransfer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 649 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 654 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 654 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 22.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 22.9% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Впервые с октября крипторынок перешел в зону жадности ▪️В пятницу индекс страха и жадности прыгнул на отметку 60 (жадность) ▪️Месяц назад - 32 (страх) ▪️Минимум года — 5 (сильный страх) был в феврале'26. Цена BTC двигалась синхронно вверх🔺. Несмотря на изменение цены биткоина, BlackRock (крупнейшая в мире компания по управлению активами) скупает биткоин без остановки — на балансе уже 806,700 BTC Курсы на сегодня: …
😁1
Betatransfer Exchanger. Сервис по обмену криптовалют pinned a photo
Bithumb хотели выплатить подарки на $450. По ошибке начислили $46 млрд. 2 месяца назад биржа Bithumb начисляла бонусы 249 пользователям — по 20 000–50 000 вон (KRW) каждому. Из-за системной ошибки, вместо вон платформа отправила BTC. Ошибку заметили не сразу, и часть клиентов уже всё продала. Итог: не удалось вернуть около 7 BTC (это $120 млн. убытков). Биржа сейчас инициирует арест имущества клиентов и судебные и…
Рынок сейчас выглядит… мягко говоря, нервно. ▪️ Более 40% альткоинов торгуются возле своих исторических минимумов. Это хуже, чем во время прошлого медвежьего рынка. ▪️ Спрос на BTC со стороны корпоративных игроков почти исчез (минус 98%). По сути, рынок сейчас держит один игрок Strategy. За месяц Strategy купила 45,000 BTC. У них 76% всех корпоративных BTC. ▪️ Индекс глобальной неопределённости на историческом мак…
Напоминаем: на нашем сайте можно обменять криптовалюту по выгодному курсу 🖤 Website
Сели читать новости крипторынка, а там: биткоин вырос, упал, опять вырос и снова упал. Вот и вся сенсация. График качается, а мы пытаемся ловить дзен на этих американских горках🙃 Курсы на сегодня: 🪙BTC = 65,9$k 🔷ETH = 1,9$k. 🖤 Website
Дайджест последних недель. Спойлер: спокойно только на кладбище. ▪️президент Польши снова ветировал MiCA. Криптобизнес внутри страны продолжает работать в режиме «ну почти легально». Лицензий нет, но вы держитесь. ▪️крупнейших казахский финтех Kaspi.kz поднял комиссии на переводы в другие банки. Деньги должны любить одну экосистему. ▪️платежка Guavapay официально уходит в ликвидацию по версии Financial Conduct Aut…
❤2👍1
Нет слов, одни эмоции... Курсы на сегодня: 🪙BTC = 67,5$k 🔷ETH = 1,9$k. 🖤 Website
❤2😱1
Интересно, поднимется ли биткоин в этом году до 100 тысяч, или будет так же колебаться между 80-90$k?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На этой недели биткоин снова демонстрирует повышенную волатильность 📉 Для одних это паника и стресс, для других — шанс пополнить портфель по вкусной цене. В общем, рынок в очередной раз проверяет нас на прочность. Посмотрим, кто сольётся на страхе, а кто воспользуется моментом.. Курсы на сегодня: 🪙BTC = 74,9$k 🔷ETH = 2,2$k. 🖤 Website
😱3
Экономист Питер Шифф снова против крипты и заявляет, что она бесполезна. Как фанат золота, он уверен: BTC никогда не принесёт денег, а золото это украшения, техника, медицина. А серебро вообще бьёт все рекорды по цене. Конечно же, криптовкладчики его послушали… и дружно побежали скупать слитки😁 Курсы на сегодня: 🪙BTC = 89,5$k 🔷ETH = 3,0$k. 🖤 Website
👍5
Более 70% инвесторов в исследовании Coinbase считают биткоин недооценённым и ожидают цену выше $95 000. Мы с этим полностью согласны! Но на сегодня рынок выглядит так👇🏼 Курсы на сегодня: 🪙BTC = 87,7$k 🔷ETH = 2,8$k. 🖤 Website
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @betatransfer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интересно, поднимется ли биткоин в этом году до 100 тысяч, или будет так же колебаться между 80-90$k?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 27 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,472,133 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Betatransfer Exchanger. Сервис по обмену криптовалют” (@betatransfer), 649 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betatransfer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.