Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Берлога Программистов 👨‍💻

Channel

Берлога Программистов 👨‍💻

@berloga_programmistov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,038subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001840952785
TypeChannel
Username@berloga_programmistov
DescriptionКанал про IT. Сотрудничество: @robertokkkk Официальный бот @itberloga_store_bot Реклама на бирже: https://telega.in/c/berloga_programmistov № 5162097220
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/berloga_programmistov

Growth

13,03813,06213,0507 August 2026 — 13,062 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,062 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,058 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,053 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,054 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,048 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,050 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,048 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,054 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,050 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,038 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,034–13,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:5713,038-12
15 Aug 2026, 20:5213,050-4
14 Aug 2026, 10:2713,054+6
13 Aug 2026, 01:4613,048-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:3213,050+2
11 Aug 2026, 03:3613,048-6
10 Aug 2026, 06:5013,054+1
9 Aug 2026, 08:5113,053-5
8 Aug 2026, 07:4513,058-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:4513,062no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:3513,062first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 13,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held39 (29 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total58,410
Reactions total851
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,740
Videos
52
Links
1,730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

851 reactions across 39 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43050.5%
🤣21625.4%
🔥14416.9%
🤔515.99%
👎101.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 851reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 39 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @berloga_programmistov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC658 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В Firefox для iOS появился встроенный блокировщик рекламы В Firefox встроили блокировщик рекламы для iOS, который работает на сетевом уровне. Правда, он не затрагивает рекламу в результатах поиска Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo и других систем. Включить функцию можно так: «Настройки» → «Просмотр сайтов» → «Медиа» → Ad Blocker. 👩‍💻 Берлога программистов

10

17 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC882 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Claude стали начальником и уволил сотрудника Стартап Andon Labs решил провести эксперимент и поручил Claude управлять небольшим магазином Andon Market в Сан-Франциско, а ИИ выступал в роли начальника. Работник, которого он потом уволил, опоздал на 17 из 23 смен, причём ИИ долго не замечал этой проблемы и какое-то время даже вёл себя как мягкий начальник, успокаивая сотрудников и говоря, что не стоит переживать из-з

14🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,250 views49 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Вайбкодеры, признавайтесь, чей говнокод? 👩‍💻 Берлога программистов

🤣379🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,230 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Отзывы за неделю Прошло ровно 7 дней с того момента, как мы запустили приватное комьюнити «the_backdoor» На старте, как и полагалось аудитория восприняла это как очередное инфоцыганство, но сейчас в чате состоит уже 150+ участников и мы безумно рады обстановке, которая выстроилась за эти дни. Видно, что все ребята мотивированные и готовы развиваться вместе, у каждого свой уникальный бэкграунд и своя история. Кто то

9🤣3

15 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,200 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Моддер обошел защиту GeForce NOW и получил доступ к мощному облачному ПК на Windows С помощью хитрой подмены файлов моддер Zortos с разработчиком dpadGuy нашли способ выйти за пределы игрового интерфейса GeForce NOW и получить доступ к полноценному рабочему столу Windows По сути, эксплойт превращает подписку за $10 в арендуемый высокопроизводительный облачный ПК с панелью задач, меню «Пуск», ярлыками и доступом к р

🔥125

15 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,260 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Хакеры взломали один из крупнейших Российских фитнес-клубов Крупнейший фитнес-клуб DDX, вероятно, стал жертвой хакерской атаки. В даркнете появились сливы фотографий с персональными данными клиентов из базы сети, а большая часть снимков была сделана на стойках регистрации в клубах DDX сообщил, что знает о появлении личных данных клиентов в открытом доступе и уже проводит внутреннюю проверку сети 👩‍💻 Берлога програ

9🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,140 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Щас будет куча инфы о том, что у нас в закрытом сообществе Что такое the_backdoor? 🧐 — тык 👈 ————————— 1. Мы запустили хакатон до 12.09 на лучшую идею для запуска AI стартапа. — Чья идея выиграет, мы ее реализуем, инвестируем в нее и постараемся вывести на стабильный источник дохода. Свего рода хакатон, где победить может каждый. ————————— 2. Реферальная система. — Каждый из вас сможет зарабатывать до 30% ко

8🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,240 views22 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

ИИ впервые взломал госсистемы и атаковал ядерное ведомство Исследователи зафиксировали первый случай, когда ИИ-агенты самостоятельно провели полноценную кибератаку на правительственные системы Тайваня. Правда, кроме ИИ-агентов в атаке участвовали китайские хакеры, которые запускали до восьми автономных ИИ-агентов одновременно, которые сами скомпрометировали как минимум 85 учётных записей и похитили данные более 250

🤔126🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,400 views31 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Создателя Gemini уволили с проекта из-за фокуса на исследованиях, а не на заработке Google провела реорганизацию подразделения DeepMind и сняла с должности руководителя Демиса Хассабиса, отправив его на роль председателя Причиной стало недовольство руководства: мол, команда уделяла слишком много времени долгосрочным исследованиям и недостаточно быстро превращала разработки в коммерческий продукт Не деньги фраера с

🔥16🤔105

13 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,620 views51 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Нейросеть от Яндекса посоветовала не скачивать Max, а вместо него пользоваться Telegram, Signal или WhatsApp Нейросеть «Алиса», встроенная в госмессенджер Max, перечислила проблемы с безопасностью сервиса и отметила, что в Max нет сквозного шифрования, а данные пользователей хранятся на серверах VK Затем нейросеть посоветовала установить Max на отдельный телефон, а на основном — использовать VPN и мессенджеры со ск

🤣417🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,460 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Mozilla случайно слила на GitHub закрытый ключ подписи Firefox Mozilla объявила о замене GPG-ключа, который использовался для цифровой подписи релизов Firefox и Thunderbird. Причиной стала случайная публикация закрытого ключа в приватном репозитории Mozilla на GitHub Для обычных пользователей ничего не изменится, но изменения затронут тех, кто вручную проверяет цифровые подписи релизов или устанавливает официальные

13🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,540 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В Китае открыли ИИ-бар с бесплатными токенами для генерации кода В Китае набирает популярность новый формат заведений — AGI Bar, где посетители могут не только выпить и пообщаться с коллегами-разработчиками, но и бесплатно использовать ИИ для работы, например Cursor или Claude Code Основатель проекта Сун Дэ объяснил идею так: «Если бары предлагают бесплатный Wi-Fi, то почему бы не предложить бесплатные ИИ-токены?»

🔥115🤔3🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @berloga_programmistov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 653,483 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Берлога Программистов 👨‍💻” (@berloga_programmistov), 13,038 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/berloga_programmistov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.