Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BERLINSKAYACOUTURE

Channel

BERLINSKAYACOUTURE

@berlinskaya_couture

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

267subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001799478103
TypeChannel
Username@berlinskaya_couture
Created26 February 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/berlinskaya_couture

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25227026131 August 2026 — 252 subscribers1 September 2026 — 256 subscribers11 September 2026 — 270 subscribers19 September 2026 — 267 subscribers26731 August 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 19 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 249–273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:01267-3
11 Sept 2026, 02:15270+14
1 Sept 2026, 09:37256+4
31 Aug 2026, 16:15252first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 February 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3445.3%
❤‍🔥3344.0%
💋34.00%
💘34.00%
🍾22.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2022 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jan 2026, 12:49 UTC526 views14 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥76💋1

21 Jan 2026, 13:07 UTC455 viewsread 31 August 2026
Poll

откликается?

  1. -0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jan 2026, 13:03 UTC446 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026

КАК ПОНЯТЬ, ВАШ ЛИ ЭТО СИЛУЭТ — ЕЩЁ ДО ТОГО, КАК ПЛАТЬЕ НАЧНУТ ШИТЬ Одна из самых больших ошибок в свадебной индустрии — убеждение, что понять «своё» платье можно только на примерке. На самом деле — нет. Примерка часто случается слишком поздно. Когда: — ткань уже куплена, — конструкция задана, — решение принято на эмоциях, — и у вас остаётся только вариант «привыкнуть». Мы работаем иначе. Силуэт — это не фасон Это

5❤‍🔥2🍾1

14 Jan 2026, 13:57 UTC406 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

ПОЧЕМУ ПРИМЕРКА — НЕ СТАРТ В свадебной индустрии принято считать, что всё начинается с примерки. На самом деле — именно здесь чаще всего всё и ломается. Примерка происходит слишком рано. Когда вы ещё не понимаете: — какой образ вам близок — какая форма вас усиливает — какое ощущение вы хотите прожить В этот момент вы примеряете не платье. Вы примеряете чужую идею. И если она не совпадает с вами — возникает ощущен

2❤‍🔥2

14 Jan 2026, 13:54 UTC385 views6 reactionsread 31 August 2026

С ЧЕГО НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ НАЧИНАЕТСЯ ПЛАТЬЕ Тема выбора платья гораздо сложнее, чем принято думать. Это не один вопрос и не одно решение. Это процесс, состоящий из нескольких ключевых точек. Мы называем его «ПОИСК ФОРМЫ». Он включает в себя: — понимание, почему примерка часто сбивает, а не помогает — умение почувствовать, ваш ли это силуэт, ещё до пошива — осознание, почему «красиво» не равно «моё» — и честный разбор о

❤‍🔥32🍾1

14 Jan 2026, 13:30 UTC351 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026

90% НЕВЕСТ ВЫБРАЛИ НЕ ТО ПЛАТЬЕ ИЛИ ПОЧЕМУ ПРОСТО КРАСИВОЕ ПЛАТЬЕ ТАК ЧАСТО «НЕ РАБОТАЕТ» Мы всё чаще слышим одну и ту же фразу. От разных девушек. В разное время. Но с одинаковым ощущением внутри: «Платье красивое — но это не я». И почти всегда за этим стоит не ошибка вкуса и не «сложная фигура». Проблема глубже. Платье слишком часто начинают выбирать не с того места. Не с той точки. Не с того вопроса. Оно не н

❤‍🔥52💋1

14 Jan 2026, 09:53 UTC356 views9 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

добро пожаловать в BERLINSKAYA COUTURE ATELIER Здесь создаются кутюрные свадебные и вечерние платья. Мы не работаем с готовыми коллекциями. Мы не отшиваем десятки платьев «на выбор». Наш подход другой: — мы создаём AI-коллекции как поле идей — смотрим, какие образы действительно откликаются — отшиваем только 3–4 флагманские модели для примерок — каждое клиентское платье создаём индивидуально: по меркам, ощущениям

4❤‍🔥4💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @berlinskaya_couture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jan 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

откликается?

  1. -0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2022 to 28 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BERLINSKAYACOUTURE” (@berlinskaya_couture), 267 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/berlinskaya_couture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.