3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 219–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 15:17
220
+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:35
219
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:47
219
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 19 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5381958200754977340
41
62.1%
custom 5420262600296381184
10
15.2%
custom 5289525887455214277
6
9.09%
custom 5434082576694270355
5
7.58%
custom 5382215529425548461
4
6.06%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 30 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @berfild_c. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 August 2025 to 30 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
continuum вживую
можно увидеть весь декабрь на выставке лучших студенческих работ студентов СПбГУ в Петропавловской крепости (г. Санкт-Петербург)
книгу (без обложки) можно полистать и потрогать на навесных стендах по левой стороне
помимо continuum - печатные издания, плакаты, портфолио и графика других студентов
вход с Никольских ворот, дверь слева от магазина денег "Монетный двор" (Госзнак)
«бабочки эрмитажа» - пример того, как дизайн одновременно работает на книгу и против неё
узнаваемость
эта книга не раз встречалась мне в магазинах, и с какого-то момента я стала узнавать её сразу — радужная, почти «голографическая» обложка, жирная типографика, декоративный корешок — её легко опознать на полке.
начиная с оформления книга являет собой разрыв привычки
привычная структура «вид — описание — иллюстрация…
init >> february_2025
location: 54.683497, 39.787408
output >> postcard "feelings()"
user: "старая февральская работа, вдохновленная oyeme. мне очень хотелось сделать что-то понятное только двум людям. фото с принта было сделано на берегу ладоги."
inspired_by: @design_c0re
status >> online
origin: Дудергоф, Санкт-Петербург
status: experimental practice → accidental concept
notes:
- изначально не было задумки, это была практика работы с кругами
- фотографии легли в формат пластинок
- текст: треки мэйбибэйби))), зашифрованные в математические и музыкальные единицы
result:
- визуальная археология
- круг превращается в медиум
- нечитаемая баланда
#щзаметь
#b_photography #b_posters #b_process #b_4lover…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @berfild_c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BERFILD” (@berfild_c), 220 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/berfild_c.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.