Channel
@bereza_knife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,258subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001696441142 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bereza_knife |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bereza_knife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 1,258 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 1,257 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 1,256 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 1,255 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 1,254 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
84 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 42.9% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 39.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5323470315370585285 | 1 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Здравствуйте. Новый продукт 99 слоёв — Мы переходим со 137-слойной многослойной стали на 99-слойную — и делаем это ради красоты и качества клинка. Более толстые слои дают крупный, контрастный рисунок: узор становится выразительнее и глубже, каждый клинок лучше раскрывает свойства ламината. Одновременно уменьшается число сварных границ в пакете — а значит, меньше потенциальных точек дефектов при ковке и стабильне…
🔥7👍2
99 слоёв Это новый ламинат. Сталь где центральный режущий слой обложен или ламинирован боковыми слоями дамасской нержавеющей стали, что в сумме дает всегда нечётное количество слоёв. Итак. 99 слоёв с центральным слоем из стали S390 Microclean. •Бритвенная острота в сочетании с повышенной прочностью и уникальным рисунком многослойного Дамаска. •Твёрдость 63-65 HRC. •Заточка 15 градусов на сторону.
🔥5👍1
Доброго дня. Мы делаем ножи из трёх сталей. Этот принцип был заложен давно, за несколько лет стали менялись, но незначительно. А в этом году мы приняли решение выпустить новый продукт.
🔥1
Здравствуйте. О рукоятях. Кроме всадного монтажа существует и накладной монтаж рукояти, но это другая история
👍2
Это финальная, но не последняя версия новой линейки. Осталось доработать материал рукоятей. Друзья, по стоимости все опишем, но не сейчас, ведется работа. К этому продукты мы подошли «правильно», учитывая все нюансы. Как вам ??
🔥10❤🔥2👍2
Всем добрый день 🤝
С праздником!
❤🔥3👍3🔥2custom 53234703153705852851
За одним ножом скрыты десятки часов работы, десятки процессов. Нам посчастливилось заложить смыслы в нашу работу в самом начале. Натуральные материалы, качество, красота. Следовать трендам и тем более бороться с ними не наш путь. Наш тренд - наши ножи 💫
❤🔥5👍4
Важнейший смысл !
В общении с заказчиком получили приятный комплимент. Если посмотреть на это чуть глубже, можно заметить интересную вещь. Японские ножи — мировой тренд. Тренд на качество, традиции и исключительность. Многие думают: если нож японский, значит он обязательно превосходный. На практике бывает по-разному. Есть немало известных японских брендов, которые давно производятся не в Японии. А из ручной работы там остаются толь…
👍6
Здравствуйте. Основные шеф ножи есть двух размеров, которые определяются длиной лезвия. 200 мм - большой нож, который предпочитают повара. Увереный и надежный нож для большинства работ на кухне. На САЙТЕ нож в 2-х сталях Для получения каталога и консультации: WhatsApp Telegram «Максим»
👍2🔥1
История 🔥 Заказали 2 стейк ножа с гравировкой и в футляре из кожи. Для чего? Что бы ходить в мясные рестораны со своими ножами. Круто ведь 💫
🔥3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bereza_knife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 869,091 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BERËZA. НОЖИ ДЛЯ КУХНИ” (@bereza_knife), 1,258 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bereza_knife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.