Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘ถ๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘น - ๐‘ช๐‘น๐’€๐‘ท๐‘ป๐‘ถ

Channel

๐‘ถ๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘น - ๐‘ช๐‘น๐’€๐‘ท๐‘ป๐‘ถ

@bereaal

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

302subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001948581145
TypeChannel
Username@bereaal
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bereaal

Growth

302307304.57 August 2026 โ€” 306 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 306 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 307 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 305 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 302 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 301โ€“308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:58302-3
23 Aug 2026, 00:47305-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:27307+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:49306no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:38306first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 December 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค733.3%
๐Ÿ‘419.0%
๐Ÿ˜314.3%
๐Ÿ†29.52%
๐Ÿ‘Œ14.76%
๐Ÿ‘14.76%
๐Ÿ”ฅ14.76%
๐Ÿ˜14.76%
๐Ÿฅฐ14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 15 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jan 2025, 23:26 UTC594 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

ู„ุนุจุฉ ุงู„ู…ุถุงุฑุจู‡ ู…ู† ู…ู†ุธูˆุฑ ุฌูŠุณูŠ ู„ูŠูุฑู…ูˆุฑ โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ

โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ1

5 Jan 2025, 22:45 UTC575 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

#STXUSDT ๐Ÿ”นุงู„ุฏุฎูˆู„:1.749 ๐Ÿ”บูˆู‚ู ุงู„ุฎุณุงุฑู‡: 1,723 ุจุฃุบู„ุงู‚ ุดู…ุนุฉ 1H ุงู„ุฃู‡ุฏุงู ู…ูˆุถุญู‡ ุนุงู„ุดุงุฑุช๐ŸŽฏ

โค3๐Ÿ‘1

5 Jan 2025, 19:06 UTC441 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

ูˆู„ู„ู‡ ุงู„ุญู…ุฏู„ู„ู‡ ุชู… ุชุญู‚ูŠู‚ ูƒุงู…ู„ ุงู„ุงู‡ุฏุงู 21% โœ…

โค1

4 Jan 2025, 20:41 UTC364 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/crypt0ticker ู‡ู†ุง ูŠุชู… ู†ุดุฑ ุงู„ุตูู‚ุงุช ๐ŸŽฏ

4 Jan 2025, 20:39 UTC300 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

- ุงุญุตุงุฆูŠุฉ ุตูู‚ุงุชู†ุง ู„ู€ ุดู‡ุฑ ุฏูŠุณู…ุจุฑ 2024 ูˆู„ู„ู‡ ุงู„ุญู…ุฏ ูƒุงู†ุช ู†ุณุจุฉ ุตูู‚ุงุชู†ุง ู…ู…ุชุงุฒู‡ ู‡ุฐุง ุงู„ุดู‡ุฑ ุจุฑุบู… ู…ู† ุงู„ู‡ุจูˆุท ุงู„ุงุฎูŠุฑ ู„ู„ุนู…ู„ุงุช ูƒู„ ู‡ุฐุง ุจุชูˆููŠู‚ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุณุจุญุงู†ู‡ ูˆู…ุงู†ุณุชุบู†ูŠ ุนู† ุฏุนู…ูƒู… ุฏุงุฆู…ุง ูˆุงุจุฏุงโค๏ธ

29 Dec 2024, 14:28 UTC276 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

ุฅุฐุง ุชุนู„ู…ุช ูƒู„ ู‡ุฐุง ุจุจุทุก ุดุฏูŠุฏุŒ ูุฐู„ูƒ ู„ุฃู†ู†ูŠ ุชุนู„ู…ุช ู…ู† ุฃุฎุทุงุฆูŠุŒ ูˆุฏุงุฆู…ู‹ุง ู…ุง ูŠู…ุฑ ุจุนุถ ุงู„ูˆู‚ุช ุจูŠู† ุงุฑุชูƒุงุจ ุงู„ุฎุทุฃ ูˆุฅุฏุฑุงูƒู‡ุŒ ูˆูˆู‚ุช ุฃุทูˆู„ ุจูŠู† ุฅุฏุฑุงูƒู‡ ูˆุชุญุฏูŠุฏู‡ ุจุฏู‚ุฉ. โ€ข ุฌูŠุณูŠ ู„ูŠูุฑู…ูˆุฑ ุฃุณุทูˆุฑุฉ ุงู„ุชุฏุงูˆู„

๐Ÿฅฐ1

27 Dec 2024, 17:23 UTC284 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

โ€œู‡ู†ุงูƒ ู…ู† ูŠุนุชู‚ุฏูˆู† ุฃู†ู‡ู… ูŠุฏุฑุณูˆู† ุงู„ุณูˆู‚ุŒ ููŠ ุญูŠู† ุฃู† ูƒู„ ู…ุง ูŠูุนู„ูˆู†ู‡ ู‡ูˆ ุฏุฑุงุณุฉ ู…ุง ู‚ุงู„ู‡ ุงู„ุขุฎุฑูˆู† ุนู† ุงู„ุณูˆู‚โ€ฆ ูˆู„ูŠุณ ู…ุง ู‚ุงู„ู‡ ุงู„ุณูˆู‚ ุนู† ู†ูุณู‡โ€ โ€ข ุฑูŠุชุดุงุฑุฏ ูˆุงูŠูƒูˆู

26 Dec 2024, 10:45 UTC272 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

โ€œุงู„ุณุฑ ูˆุฑุงุก ุงู„ู†ุฌุงุญ ู…ู† ู…ู†ุธูˆุฑ ุงู„ุชุฏุงูˆู„ ู‡ูˆ ุงู…ุชู„ุงูƒ ุฑุบุจุฉ ู„ุง ุชุนุฑู ุงู„ูƒู„ู„ ูˆู„ุง ุงู„ู…ู„ู„ุŒ ูˆุนุทุด ู„ุง ูŠูุฑูˆู‰ ู„ู„ู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุช ูˆุงู„ู…ุนุฑูุฉ.โ€ โ€ข ุจูˆู„ ุชูŠูˆุฏูˆุฑ ุฌูˆู†ุฒ

22 Dec 2024, 11:51 UTC271 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

ุณู„ุณู„ุฉ #ุจูˆุตู„ุฉ_ุงู„ู…ุชุฏุงูˆู„ (ุงุจุญุซ ุนู† ุงู„ู†ุธุงู… ุงู„ุฐูŠ ูŠู†ุงุณุจูƒ ูˆู„ูŠุณ ู…ุงูŠู†ุงุณุจ ุบูŠุฑูƒ)

๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ‘1

19 Dec 2024, 08:44 UTC275 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

#BTCUSDT ุงู„ุญู…ุฏู„ู„ู‡ ุชู… ุงู„ุชู†ุจูŠู‡ ู…ู† ุจุฏุงูŠุฉ ุธู‡ูˆุฑ ุงู„ุถุนู ๐Ÿ‘ ุงู„ุงุฑุชุฏุงุฏ ูˆุงุฑุฏ ู…ู† ุงู„ู…ู†ุงุทู‚ ุงู„ุญุงู„ูŠู‡

18 Dec 2024, 10:32 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0tickerPhoto

ุณู„ุณู„ุฉ #ุจูˆุตู„ุฉ_ุงู„ู…ุชุฏุงูˆู„ (ุงู„ุงุจุชุนุงุฏ ุนู† ุงู„ู‚ุทูŠุน)

๐Ÿ†2๐Ÿ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bereaal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘ถ๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘น - ๐‘ช๐‘น๐’€๐‘ท๐‘ป๐‘ถโ€ (@bereaal), 302 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bereaal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.