Если есть идеи, что еще предпринять - напишите пожалуйста. Очень хочу разобраться поскорее в этой ситуации. Самому противно, что яхтенный блог превращается в блог сутяги.
👍2

Channel
@bepa_sailing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
499subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001370700923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bepa_sailing |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bepa_sailing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 499 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 499 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
160 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 99 | 61.9% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 16.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 9.38% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 3.75% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.625% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если есть идеи, что еще предпринять - напишите пожалуйста. Очень хочу разобраться поскорее в этой ситуации. Самому противно, что яхтенный блог превращается в блог сутяги.
👍2
determine which of the identified facts are of legal relevance; provide a recommendation on the further strategy (claim, negotiations, formal reservation of rights, expert examination, litigation). I look forward to your professional analysis and am available to provide any additional data, including the original Excel files, correspondence and photographic material. Yours sincerely, Alexey Vorobyov Owner of BEPA…
Друзья, увы, продолжается эпопея с Грегором. Товарищ на голубом глазу продолжает настаивать на своей правоте. Ингольф написал, что его дело - технические вопросы, что логично. Пришлось вспоминать старые связи. В 2015 году мы гонялись на ARC+ командой наполовину из Питера, наполовину из Словении. В команде были Сречо, Андраш и Альяж Задеки. Владельцы крупной Словенской юридической фирмы. Альяж написал, что подобные во…
Это переписка с Андреем, ещё одним владельцем Shipman. Он был первым, кто сделал арку на шестьдесят третьей модели. Я усомнился, что дизайнеру Марко Пажу действительно было заплачено восемнадцать с половиной тысяч евро за план ламинации и это комментарии Андрея.
🤔2
Photo, posted without a caption
Новый ролик про покраску яхты никак доделать не могу. Взял билеты в Любляну на восьмое июля. Попробую поснимать на борту текущее состояние рефита. Появились трения с Грегором. Пока не выкладываю сюда его отчёт в Экселе по цене работ, но двести пятьдесят часов работы механиков по весьма свежим (купленным и установленным в Малайзии) двигателю и генератору вызвали у меня небольшие сомнения. Скажем капитальный ремонт Yan…
👍13🔥4🤔4🤝2👀1🤗1😐1
Взял интервью у Ольги Алексеевны. Не обращайте внимания на небольшой дух противоречия там. Все же тринадцать лет, переходный возраст.
👍7❤6🔥2
https://youtu.be/dARgodh20T0?si=G-xYCkmEu2XWkEYZ
❤10👍7
Очередное видео про рефит.
👍10
https://youtu.be/8vUuHG6j28c?is=YOD4pDS-Ujm72aPU
👍10
Ещё одно видео с пока закрытым доступом. https://youtu.be/z4D7dXhymCE
👍4
доступ пока не открывал. Взял интервью у Юрия Дорошенко. https://youtu.be/wwn6hfzwLXU
❤4👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bepa_sailing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яхта Вера” (@bepa_sailing), 499 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bepa_sailing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.