Channel
@bensvault
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
466subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002971260119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bensvault |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bensvault |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 466 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 460 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 455 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 439 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 438 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 438 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 878 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
35 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 31.4% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 17.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Weekly summary 📝 (3/08/26_7/08/26) Gold Prime Signals 24 Trades Sent 📲 19 wins ✅ 3 Stop loss ❌ 2 early close ➖ Win rate: 88% 🤠 Pips gained +2160🏆 TGC 146 wins 🔥 9 losses 👎🏽 Win rate 92.6% 😎
👏2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Amazing finish to the week .. 100% day ‼️‼️ TGC 🔥 22 wins 🏆 0 losses 🤠 Gold Prime 4 trades sent 📲 4 wins ✅ 0 losses ❌ Congrats to all of you churning out some profits. I know we have traders using the other groups too but I don’t see their stats as I’m not trading their groups but hope you guys have all had a great finish to the week too. We know trading can be frustrating and bash the shit out of us mentally b…
❤3💯2
This is exactly what it’s all about ❤️❤️ In, take your profits, out and get on with your days 🙌🏽
❤2👍2
Mountaineering again 🥴 Finished with 50 chest dips 50 pull ups 50 heel raises squats Have a good day at it, NFP today so markets may make some abrupt moves and be more volatile than normal, this can play into our favour for sure but risk management and rules are most important on these days. Stay disciplined and adhere to your rules 🙌🏽
TGC Results 🔥 29 wins 🏆 1 loss 👎🏽 Gold Prime Results 5 trades sent 📲 3 wins ✅ 1 SL ❌ 1 early close -30 pips 👎🏽
👏2
Nice bit of variety here 👌🏼 The reason I asked is because I wanted to highlight something that pretty much all of us will experience. It’s happened to me personally too. Right now, I only use two groups myself and don’t even have access to the others. The reality is, we all get FOMO. It’s human nature. But constantly jumping from group to group rarely works in your favour over the long term. More often than not, i…
👍5❤3💯2
Which group are you using most?
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
TGC Wednesday results 33 wins 🏆 2 losses ❌ The success rate the last few weeks has been through the roof. I hope you’re all keeping to your rules and discipline 🙏🏼 💰
👍2❤1
Gold Prime Results 🔥 5 trades sent 📲 5 wins ✅ 0 loss ❌ Consistent with trades, consistent with results. Jeff is on form as he was back in January February when he was serving the community 👏🏼👏🏼
🔥4❤1
FAO EVERYONE.. 🫱🏼🫲🏽 RE EVERYTHING & ANYTHING.. 💡
🔥2🙏1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bensvault. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which group are you using most?
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Charlie’s House📈🏃🏽♂️🧠” (@bensvault), 466 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bensvault.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.