Channel
@benchouse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
265subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001959922496 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @benchouse |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/benchouse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 265 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 266 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 266 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 677 |
| Reactions total | 64 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
64 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5366540947494558330 | 25 | 39.1% | |
| custom 5366261315058816328 | 19 | 29.7% | |
| custom 5240068961084661034 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5370671039585998975 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5400254069946208695 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| custom 5242750708599511823 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5433695406867372051 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5433601995623652792 | 1 | 1.56% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Геодезический знак в Бикерниекском лесу на востоке Риги, Латвия. От его локации примерно 1,3 километра по прямой до Brīvības iela (= улица Свободы), которая является частью дороги, проходящей от центра Риги до центра Пскова. Никаких обозначений на конструкциях знака кажется нет, но находится он на точке с высотой 19 метров. За фото спасибо Б.
custom 53662613150588163285custom 54336954068673720511
Знак нивелировки на берегу Савского озера в Белграде, Сербия. До впадения Савы в Дунай от его локации по прямой примерно 7,5 километров. Надпись: GRADSKI NIVELMAN 8493 Собственно слова означают 'городская нивелировка/нивелирная сеть'. За фото спасибо Е.
custom 53662613150588163284custom 54002540699462086953custom 53665409474945583301
Советский геодезический знак в Алматы, Казахстан. Был найден в начале февраля 2025 после нескольких дней безрезультатных поисков каких-либо знаков вообще. Есть вероятность, что их маловато, потому что землетрясения и капром. Надпись читается наполовину, различима аббревиатура ГУГК в правой верхней части. Слева, скорее всего, тоже 3-4 буквы, а на выступающем элементе — цифры, но краска не позволила это понять точно…
custom 53665409474945583306custom 53662613150588163282custom 53706710395859989751
Ещё знаки из Иванова, сегодня с номерами 1376 и 1496. В прошлом посте я делал предположение, что они размещены в 1970-80-х, поскольку создают вайб позднесоветской кастрюли. Так и оказалось, дом с теми знаками построен в 1975, то есть им максимум 51 год. На контрасте с марками нивелировки Савицкого в СПб 1872 года это как будто ничего, но на самом деле очень солидно. За фото вновь спасибо К.
custom 53665409474945583307custom 53662613150588163284custom 53706710395859989751custom 54336019956236527921
Предположительно знак триангуляционной сети в Зеленоградске. Назначение видно из букв TP (= trigonometrischer Punkt или Triangulationspunkt). Ещё это показывает, что знак прусский. Водонапорная башня (общий вид на фото 4), на основании которой его можно найти, построена в Кранце (Зеленоградск) к 1905 году.
custom 53706710395859989754custom 53662613150588163282custom 53665409474945583301
В Сортавале нашлась нивелировка того же дизайна, что в Выборге. На первый взгляд, она будто немного отличается от выборгских, но если фото какой-нибудь их них перевернуть (фото 5), то видно, что и крепления, и полочка на своих местах. Не видно только третьего крепления, но оно скрыто, скорее всего, за буквами KP (= kiintopiste = геодезический пункт). На фото 2-4 видно эту марку в 2015, 19 и 23 годах; изображения с…
custom 52400689610846610346custom 53665409474945583303custom 53662613150588163282
Хоть что-то схожее по форме есть в Печорах, геодезические знаки из Иванова показывают на данный момент уникальный для этого канала дизайн. Тут есть шесть углов, номера 1420 (фото 1, 3, 4) и 1598 (фото 2, 5, 6), по три гвоздя (а не центральный хвостовик внутри стены, что обычно для стенных знаков 20 века, что размещались в СССР) и элемент, который называют утиным носом (в центре). Как и почти везде, мы пока не знаем…
custom 53665409474945583307custom 52427507085995118232custom 54336954068673720511
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @benchouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,231,287 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нивеллировочная” (@benchouse), 265 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/benchouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.