Channel
@belugatennis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
110subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002123561243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @belugatennis |
| Created | 22 March 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/belugatennis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 110 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 113 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 119 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 126 | +22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 104 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 104 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 102 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 22 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
WTA TORONTO: EALA, SVITOLINA, PEGULA, OSAKA. The data suggests Eala is the only player capable of an upset today. Kourneeva is interesting but too little data to predict her upsetting Coco Gauff who is priced just right if not slightly over valued.
📊EALA TAKES THE WIN: The Beluga Model also had Osaka to win yesterday which is now showing very promising results with 4/5 wins from the model. I'll run the model in a few hours and put up some more selections if there's any Beluga picks which is basically been trained to pick selections I would consider the highest quality for value.
📊Alexandra Eala plays in WTA Tornoto and is in red hot form with Mcnally standing little chance. Buluga gives Eala a 76% chance taking the match.
📊KORNEEVA SMASHES JOVIC: The Beluga Signal knew it was coming Iva Jovic was SMASHED 3-6, 4-6. Anisimova survived the Beluga yesterday as was down 4-2 in the final set but no such luck for Jovic. So the full model of picking slight outsiders could of easily of gone 2/2. We're still in BETA TESTING but it's already made more money than my personal supposed knowledge based predictions.
📊IVA JOVIC IS ON THE RISE: But she faces a tough eveneing against former Junior Champion Korneeva who is rapidly improving. The value is backing Korneeva for the win due to the value.
Value Odds 2.63: Nikola Bartunkova to beat Amanda Anisimova *Model favors backing Bartunkova above the market price. Anisimova loses 30% of matches when priced as favorite across 23 outings — same red flag on the other side. Bartunkova wins 45% of matches as the underdog (5/11) — outperforming market price as a dog.
Kalinskaya & Keys Wins Toronto (Canada), hard WTA - SINGLES 6/8/26 Kalinskaya v Shnaider Kostyuk v Keys
PLAYERS TO BACK PRE MATCH OR INPLAY: Jovic, Mertens, Cristea are in form and Korneeva is playing a struggling Emma Navarro. ✅Jovic ✅Korneeva ✅Mertens ✅Cristea ***More information coming this week on this exciting project***
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @belugatennis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beluga Signals” (@belugatennis), 110 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belugatennis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.