Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Белогорье info

Channel

Белогорье info

@belogor_info

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

403subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001313900173
TypeChannel
Username@belogor_info
DescriptionЗдесь все о событиях в Белгороде и области. По любым вопросам сюда: @belogor_infoBot
Created24 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/belogor_info

Growth

4036 Aug 2026, 07:32 — 403 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:45 — 403 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 07:326 Aug 2026, 19:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 402–404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:45403no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:32403first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
588
Videos
116
Links
1,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4737.9%
🤡1915.3%
🥱129.68%
😁97.26%
🤣97.26%
👍86.45%
👎54.03%
👏54.03%
🥴43.23%
21.61%
🤯21.61%
🔥10.806%
😱10.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2025 to 12 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2025, 14:35 UTC593 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не знаю кто Вы, мадам, но Вы наверное не знаете Парменову. Он ведь только и ждёт того, чтобы его жопу кто-то поимел.

😁2💯1🤣1🥱1

4 Oct 2025, 19:30 UTC≈2,300 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Белгородский петух Парменова снова вышла на митинг в Тбилиси. Почему этого педика до сих пор не арестовала полиция и не набутылила решительно не ясно. Так же не ясно, почему наша власть не делает запрос на его экстрадицию или хотя бы не подсвечивает что он там гадит.

🤡13👎4💯3🥱3👍1🤯1😱1

16 Sept 2025, 14:52 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Трейлер от подписчика на первое заседание Белгородской областной Думы 😂

🥴4

25 Jul 2025, 06:36 UTC≈1,130 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Наконец-то мы дождались каминг-аута от белгородского открытого пидораса Парменова. А то всё стеснялся. Мы же не просто так его всё это время называли пидарсом. Мы просто называли вещи своими именами.

😁7💯4🤣3🥱2👎1🤯1

23 Jul 2025, 06:00 UTC≈1,140 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Долбоеб, Базу цитируют потому что это медиа с именем на 1М+ подписчиков, а не твой ноунейм кАНАЛьчик, который нахуй никому не нужен. Цитируют Базу о том, что танк переехал человека, потому, что Базу знают, а твой всратый Пепел никто кроме тебя и твоего пиздлявого кружка пидоров не знает. А не потому что боятся, даун )))

💯8🤡3🥱2

21 May 2025, 18:58 UTC961 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ахахаха 😂 Педрило, который сам воровал контент и при чем не один раз затирал вотерки предъявлят Ливсону, что он затирает вотерки 😂 Ну пидарас ведь, при чем и в плохом и в переносном смысле.

💯7🥱2

19 Apr 2025, 05:44 UTC866 viewsread 6 August 2026

Реально смешной чудик. Он реально считает, что канал в телеге в 30К, который в основном читают хохлы и такие же беглые пидорасы как и он сам это достижение 😁

19 Apr 2025, 05:42 UTC868 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Педик притягивает за уши свою важность. При этом ставит себя в один ряд с белгородскими медиа, которые в несколько раз крупнее его 😂 не, ну зачёт, че уж там. Парменова, смотри не тресни от важности, что твой говноканал, пополнился еще одной тысячью хохлов 🤣 P. S. Так интересно наблюдать как Парменова завидует успеху Ливсона и Ко

1

13 Apr 2025, 15:37 UTC643 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну и без обозначения себя как пидораса тоже никуда. Напоминаем, что употребление фемминитивов это первый признак принадлежности к ЛГБТ* сообществу. *признано экстремистским

💯7🤡3🥱1

13 Apr 2025, 15:34 UTC607 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну тут можно сказать только одно - свинья везде демократию найдёт 🤣

🤣51

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @belogor_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Mar 2025, 08:53 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

Вы за сохранение сердца возле "Маяка" в Белгороде как памятник?

  1. Да81%
  2. Нет19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2025 to 12 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 552,312 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Белогорье info” (@belogor_info), 403 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belogor_info.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.