Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 捡尸合集

Channel

捡尸合集

@beifengchuiachui7823

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003741079258
TypeChannel
Username@beifengchuiachui7823
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/beifengchuiachui7823

Growth

5886726 August 2026 — 58 subscribers15 August 2026 — 66 subscribers23 August 2026 — 72 subscribers8 September 2026 — 85 subscribers10 September 2026 — 85 subscribers14 September 2026 — 86 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 20:1786+1
10 Sept 2026, 13:2385no change
8 Sept 2026, 07:0185+13
23 Aug 2026, 12:5772+6
15 Aug 2026, 15:0566+8
6 Aug 2026, 19:5258first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 7 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 86 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.7
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held7 (7 September 20268 September 2026)
Views total148
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 23m
Average length
16m 42s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 18:06 UTC21 viewsread 10 September 2026
Video

#内地网红夫妻SM情趣 出品:#D先生和C小姐 平台:#Onlyfans 标签:#内地情趣 #夫主妻奴

8 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC22 viewsread 10 September 2026
Video

翘臀人妻被老公蒙上眼睛后送给黑人兄弟双管齐下

8 Sept 2026, 16:46 UTC20 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

#东京家畜人资源调度中心 (收费男M) 所在地:日本东京 主理人:#凛龍 #YAPOO 收费标准: 🈴 2小时:10,000日元 🈴 之后 5,000日元/小时 * 酒店费用等由顾客承担。 发货地点 东京23区及东京近郊支付往返交通费; ️服务内容 * 完全服从女主要求无NG; * 重度踢裆、打烙印、剃光头等影响后续工作的服务将收取额外费用。 主要使用示例 ・减压沙袋打击奴隶 ・鞭打、捆绑、吊挂、针刺、烙印等艰苦训练和酷刑练习台 ・体力劳动的牛/马奴隶 ・性玩具舔狗奴隶 ・喝尿、食用黄金、经血等厕奴; ・M 电影演员 ・各种SM恋物活动、SM女子会等 官网: 标签:#日本风俗业 #SM俱乐部

8 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC25 viewsread 10 September 2026
Video

#内地绳艺束缚 #女仆调教日记 出品:#皆非 标签:#内地BDSM #绳艺

7 Sept 2026, 18:06 UTC42 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

精彩视频每日更新 关注不迷路 #深喉 #口交 #颜射

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @beifengchuiachui7823. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“捡尸合集” (@beifengchuiachui7823), 86 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beifengchuiachui7823.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.