Channel
@beautytales
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
684subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001187310033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautytales |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautytales |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 684 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 688 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 690 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 693 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 695 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 695 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
86 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 53.5% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 22.1% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 10.5% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 6.98% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.49% | |
| custom 5325705923157582015 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.16% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я сегодня потрошу Рив Гош, как вы уже поняли по предыдущим постам. Найдена новинка у Shiseido. Хайл - румяна -бронзер: в зависимости от оттенка. Нравится, что выходят новинки и у нас, но не нравятся цены, что уж там говорить. Я все никак не привыкну к этой новой «ценовой» реальности.
❤3👍3
И тут же цена на один тональный бальзам от Loreal😅
❤4😁1
Видели цены на Clinique в Рив Гош? Захотелось обновок. Вообще скучаю по High Impact Mascara, надо бы ее раздобыть😍
❤5
Первая половина лета прошла, говорят, а мы продолжаем чревоугодничать и наслаждаться видами Северного Кавказа, несколько потерявшись во времени. На КМВ появилась парочка вкусных и очень «инстаграмных» мест: • Nayna в Кисловодске, где почти каждое блюдо - гастрономический фейерверк, а интерьер вызывает желание поделиться им в соцсетях • Варвара - кофейня в Пятигорске на Цветнике, где можно так же и перекусить, если …
❤7
Брендовая ситуативочка🔥 Мои мысли об этом инфоповоде прикрепила в комментариях😅
⚡6custom 53257059231575820152
Разбирала утром директ… Что это было?🤣
❤9
Так девочки, Москва и Петербург - началась крутая коллаба DTMS с Nothing Fancy: при заказе Don’t Touch My Set - боул с креветками и восстанавливающий напиток с электролитами ( отлично в жару✨)- дарят обновленную увлажняющую сыворотку с пептидом меди. Акция действует до 15 июля, успевайте🔥
👍9❤2
Все по 7… … тысяч рублей - с такой стоимостью висят боксы Gold Apple на сайте. Ажиотажа не вижу, зато вижу кучу банок СТМ и, в целом, посредственный для такой стоимости состав 😳 Камон, мы все потратили на Герлены, Дольче и Живанши, ну какие боксы 😕
🤣9❤5
Блогерские приятности нашли меня и на отдыхе: у DTMS вышла обновленная версия увлажняющей сыворотки, и они выпустили креативную рассылку в коллаборации с фарфором Антихрупкость. Сыворотку полностью «пересобрали» и в основу положили пептид меди, косметика с которым в последнее время пользуется активным спросом, а так же добавили фосфолипиды, комплекс с аминокислотами, трегалозой, чтобы восстановить кожу и увлажнить е…
❤9🥰3
Понравилась сумка на Ламоде - на лето гонять. Захожу читать отзывы - стойкое ощущение, что оформление упаковки знакомое… мне кажется или они вдохновились Polene?
👍7❤2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @beautytales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“beautytales.ru” (@beautytales), 684 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautytales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.