2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 02:47
232
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:07
232
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
350.0%
avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
Avg views / post
812
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
6 (20 May 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
812
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
564
Videos
28
Links
140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
95.3%
🔥
3
4.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мой любимый бренд Геворга neblednaya, к большому сожалению, попал в вайдберисную безысходность в июле, за которой мы с вами наблюдали и сочувствовали
в соцсетях Небледной в связи с этим можно поймать очень приятные акции на отдельные позиции, но главное - нам с вами выделили промокодик SUMMER12 для дополнительной скидки 12% на сайте bygevmua.shop до 19 августа
продолжаю обожать кисти бренда, скульптор и бронзер, кр…
ситуация палеточная с cheeryep вот такая 💐
начала тест с нижней, самой для меня загадочной)
а зеленую верхнюю брала сама пару месяцев назад, но базово над ней чахла без причины, есть за мной такой грешок
что точно могу сказать - запакованы они прекрасно: очень плотно лежат в коробках+внутри стоит защита, с которой зеленая палетка успешнейше поездила со мной на работу пару недель и осталась в идеальном состоянии, ч…
коротко про меня и минимализм в выборе ✨ 10 из 16 цветов за раз, базовый нюдик в школу 🐣
мне пришло две большие шикарные посылки, буду их понемножку показывать
тут - палетка neon китайского бренда Cheeryep, которых я давненько хотела затестить, потому что упаковки и в целом продукты очень интересные, а тут такой повод 🎁
если вдруг вы тоже собирались что-то брать, и не хотите ждать, пока я разрожусь обзорами (100% …
Глобально у меня блогерский минимализм в острой фазе, думаю, как у многих сейчас
Ловлю гиперфикс только в аккаунтах у пары человек из тех, с кем лично не знакома:
Эля @gloweblow тут и в инсте, моя любовь и какой-то монстр продуктивности
по-прежнему на ют лидирует Настя Нами @nastya_nami1 , нахожусь в процессе просмотра огромного видео про - разумеется - палетки 🤌
Даша Чадова из коллег @chadovadasha
и моя новая…
За год у меня неплохо отросли волосы! фото 1 - май 2025, а фото 2 из сегодня 🐣
Похихикала с теории Эми Полер, что девочки, которые любят лошадей, сами part horse, поэтому вполне гривасты 🥸 Речь шла про Билли Айлиш и Дженнифер Лоуренс, ну тупо мы 🦁
Есть свои нюансы с этим отросшим фактом, сегодня я хочу поговорить про главный малоприятный: с объемом мы попрощались 🐸 И из-за длины, и из-за моего конячьего образа жиз…
🔥На сайте Сефоры появился эксклюзивный бренд — MARC JACOBS BEAUTY.
Всего вышло 7 долгожданных продуктов:
⚫️Бронзер без талька Legally Bronze Talc-Free Blurring Powder Bronzer в 8 оттенках $42;
⚫️Кремовые румяна в стике Joystick Buildable Cream Blush Stick в 10 оттенках $35;
⚫️Однушки теней в текстуре крем-пудра Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow в 14 оттенках $29;
⚫️Стойкие кремовые помады Heart On Long-…
❤6
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @beautymigraine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиза Мигрень / beautymigraine” (@beautymigraine), 232 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautymigraine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.