🥺

Channel
Beauty girl’s girl
@beautygirlsgirl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
282subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001818031672 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautygirlsgirl |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautygirlsgirl |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 282 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 284 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 286 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 287 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 291 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 290 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
97 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5415725491334168904 | 40 | 41.2% | |
| custom 5201665283374196737 | 13 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5204220393778327516 | 10 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5219788039613594609 | 10 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5249123284720558794 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| custom 5255947571142074717 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| custom 5204446145849340323 | 5 | 5.15% | |
| custom 5221968255207356293 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| custom 5219984109165625646 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| custom 5377446887366344996 | 2 | 2.06% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
пс наполнение намного хуже, чем было
custom 52016652833741967373custom 52219682552073562933
сюрприз бокс теперь стоит 2500 бьютисов вместо 5000
custom 54157254913341689045
кстати, я забыла сказать, что условия подключения от компании к компании - разные, нужно узнавать у работодателя 👌🏻
custom 53774468873663449961
так, давно все хотела поделиться и никак не могла найти время для поста в конце прошлого года у нас на работе появился новый зарплатный проект от Альфа Банка, я решила изучить их презу и поняла, что у них очень классная премиальная программа (alfa only), подключила и с тех пор ни разу не пожалела много категорий кешбека, для зарплатных клиентов аж 7% бизнес-залы, компенсация такси, страховка путешественника (пользо…
custom 54157254913341689044custom 52197880396135946093custom 52559475711420747172custom 53774468873663449961
Channel photo updated
Капельницы красоты 💫 Нет, в выпуске не утверждают, что капельницы красоты бесполезны, а скорее доказывают, что рынок таких услуг во многом плохо контролируется и может быть смертельно опасен Я узнала из выпуска, что подобные витаминные капельницы можно сделать даже в салонах красоты, массажных салонах, фитнес-центрах и по факту это запрещено Основные тейки из выпуска следующие: • Капельницы стали массовой услугой…
custom 54157254913341689045custom 52016652833741967373custom 52491232847205587941
сюдаааааааа https://ozon.ru/t/tPPXTlr
custom 52016652833741967377custom 52559475711420747172
Я тут наткнулась на новый сезон Ревизорро, оказывается, теперь Летучая ходит не по ресторанам, а по клиникам, бьюти-процедурам и прочим местам сферы услуг Вчера посмотрела выпуск про стоматологию и была в шоке ☹️ Также из интересных выпусков отметила для себя: косметология/пластическая хирургия, капельницы красоты, диетология и похудение Хотите поделюсь основными тейками из выпусков?
custom 54157254913341689047custom 52042203937783275164custom 52197880396135946093
на официальном сайте зелински раздают духи 10 мл в подарок ❤️ по промокоду foryou10 аромат рандомный, но все равно приятно! акция действует вроде как до 30.07 при заказе в пункт выдачи
custom 54157254913341689045custom 52044461458493403232custom 52199841091656256462
h&m 🥹
custom 54157254913341689049custom 52044461458493403232custom 52559475711420747172
на lamoda много классных скидок
custom 52491232847205587945custom 54157254913341689043custom 52044461458493403231
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @beautygirlsgirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dubaiz · 113,346
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beauty girl’s girl” (@beautygirlsgirl), 282 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautygirlsgirl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.