Channel
@beauty_rom_blog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
241subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001515897157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beauty_rom_blog |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beauty_rom_blog |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 241 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 242 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 243 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 245 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 247 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 247 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
89 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 48.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 11.2% | |
| 🆒 | 8 | 8.99% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.74% | |
| custom 5397918745903508258 | 5 | 5.62% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 5.62% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5246930106915504535 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| custom 5256141428785957102 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| custom 5397778373487373191 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| custom 5411095087092343802 | 1 | 1.12% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда ничего не ожидаешь, получаешь больше, чем хотел 😁 Так случилось с эмульсией с пробиотиками от бренда Mono Puri. Первое знакомство с брендом началось с тоника, который давай эффект легкой шлифовки кожи и, как следствие, сияние. Я его брала для работы. Затем заказала эмульсию, которая меня приятно удивила. Вечером решила наносить только его. Так как кожа стала очень раздражительной. И что я получаю с утра? Бол…
❤3👍1
В этой укладке важно ☝🏼 не расчёсывать получившиеся локоны, иначе получите очень пушистую и объемную голову 💥 И даже лака не нужно 🙂↔️ Достаточно подготовки: увлажнения и термозащиты, после укладки — текстурайзер. Готово ✔️ Повторили бы? #укладка #прическа
❤6🔥6🤪2custom 53977783734873731912
Я не могу 🫠 Этот образ в самое 🩵
❤10🔥4custom 53979187459035082583
Объем и стойкость укладки (на фен и на горячий инструмент) 🧚🏼♀️ Покупаю второй раз уже Беру в ЗЯ 💚 #рекомендация_волосы
❤3👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤8😱5🆒5
Немного предыстории с датами 💁🏻♀️ Что-то яркое и со стразами я любила всегда 🫠 Даты на фото тому факту доказательства 🔝 И когда мне попалась работа на показе от Пэт МакГрат, я решила —«оно мне надо» 😂 Ниже покажу вам результат ✨ Оцените его, пожалуйста 🩵 (А то иначе зачем этот блог вообще)
❤6💘3🆒3
Булочки, разбираю кейс и вот, что нашла. Продаю палетки: Klog - покупала для обзора, красилась один раз, 500₽ Stasy Alex - купила, но потом купила Denona Yucca и поняла, что оттенки дублируются, 900₽ Tom Ford insolent rose - 3900₽ (работала, но брала почти всегда один цвет, дублеры тоже есть уже у меня в других палетках) Patrick Ta major demension - красилась один раз, пару раз брала темные цвета для работы, все (ест…
❤2custom 52561414287859571022👍1
Как я восстанавливаю разбитую косметику 💆♀️ А у вас есть разбитые, но красивые продукты? 🥚 #лайфхаки
❤2custom 53979187459035082582👍1
Этот продукт очень меня удивил 🤓 Понравился эффект?) Брала в ЗЯ #рекомендация_макияж
❤3custom 52469301069155045352custom 54110950870923438021
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @beauty_rom_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beauty_Rom Blog” (@beauty_rom_blog), 241 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beauty_rom_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.