Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
the stuff that dreams are made of
@beautifulwhitenoize
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001358295208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautifulwhitenoize |
| Description | at times it was almost as if he were trying to put himself together out of some bizarre jigsaw by @ROGAVKA https://letterboxd.com/ROGAVKA/ |
| Created | 11 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautifulwhitenoize |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 71 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 71 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 162.9%
- avg views ÷ 71 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 116
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.93%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 October 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 694 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 48
- Links
- 60
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💊 | 19 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
а вот Дэвид Хокни умер почти два месяца назад, а я так ничего и не написал. хотя 2025 в плане живописи был абсолютно годом Хокни: в мае - старательно спланированное посещение гигантской ретроспективы в парижском Луи Виттоне, в июле - абсолютно случайное пересечение с выставкой в Белградском музее современного искусства (Хокни, оказывается, приехал с выставкой в Белград в 70ом и, по словам сербов, resonated for a long…
💊1
Кавински на неделе сел в свою красную Феррари и уехал в неоновый закат. не претендуя на экспертность, осторожно замечу, что, судя по открытым источникам, именно он с французскими сотоварищами (в число которых входит, например, Квентин Дюпье) несет ответственность за зарождение синтвейва/ретровейва, как "нового" жанра в середине нулевых; а значит можно пофантазировать про мир без Кавински, где кто-то умирает в конце Д…
💊6
круто: заполнять заявку на визу в страну, где с одной фестивальной сцены выступают Sea Power и Стюарт Ли некруто: поднимать даты восемнадцати путешествий в suspicious страны по версии сайта gov.uk
💊2
вообще Naked - абсолютно разрывной фильм, какой-то бешеный мастер-класс по созданию безумно противоречивых живых персонажей, которые в один момент вызывают отвращение, через минуту смех, через две жалость, через три восхищение. и фильм целиком такой - с одной стороны каноничная "чернуха", с другой оторвать взгляд невозможно. ультимативный фильм про "одиночество в городе" - причем не игрушечное в духе "белой воротничо…
у заполонивших интернет в честь выхода Одиссеи шуток про Гомера и Мардж сильная энергия Джонни из фильма Naked 1993 года, пытающегося второй раз подряд пошутить шутку про Homer-sexuals (за вычетом невероятной харизмы Дэвида Тьюлиса)
Photo, posted without a caption
хочется написать что-то про финал Медведя, причем написать без спойлеров, потому что все разговоры про Медведя с друзьями обычно сводятся к "я посмотрел до середины третьего сезона и забил". во-первых, это, конечно, не дело. с первых же серий финального сезона становится понятно, что у Кристофера Сторера перед глазами всегда был четкий план и его неотъемлемой частью всегда была знаменитая смена темпа между вторым и …
вот это довод
💊2
"Those of us born before that fateful September," observes the Revᵈ, "make up a generation in all British History uniquely insulted, each Life carrying a chronologick Wound, from the same Parliamentary Stroke. Perhaps we are compell'd, even unknowingly, to seek these Undecamerous Sequences, as areas of refuge that may allow us, if only for a moment, to pretend Life undamaged again. We think of 'our' Time, being held,…
(продолжение) книга года - Gravity's Rainbow. возможно не самая честная номинация, потому что на Радугу я потратил половину 24го года и всего пару месяцев в 25ом. или потому что Радуга - не книга, а фильм, набранный текстом, а точнее киномюзикл. ну и похуй: дочитывание Радуги стало для меня, во-первых, своеобразной кульминацией двухлетней карьеры "человека, читающего художку на английском" (и не читавшего много лет …
💊4
выползаю из лиминального пространства с итогами года: фильм года - Sleuth (1972). фильм-головоломка, фильм-аттракцион, фильм-кубик-рубик, постоянно пересобирающий сам себя и зрителя. последний фильм Джозефа Манкевича - не того Манкевича, который "Манк" и Гражданин Кейн, а его брата. короче, титан золотого века голливуда дожил до самой крутой декады в истории кино (70ых), чтобы снять шедевр. прыгать внутрь абсолютно …
💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @beautifulwhitenoize. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 545,775 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“the stuff that dreams are made of” (@beautifulwhitenoize), 71 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautifulwhitenoize.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.