Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Моторний коzак

Channel

Моторний коzак

@beatbarenboim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,609subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001192854712
TypeChannel
Username@beatbarenboim
Created20 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/beatbarenboim

Growth

1,6061,6091,607.56 August 2026 — 1,606 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,606 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,609 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,609 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,606–1,609 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:561,609+2
12 Aug 2026, 06:171,607-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:521,609+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:001,607+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:321,606no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:551,606first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
106.5%
avg views ÷ 1,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (6 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total10,280
Reactions total368
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,249 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁68454.8%
🤣13610.9%
🍾675.36%
💯675.36%
👍413.28%
😎403.20%
🤡372.96%
💩272.16%
🤩221.76%
🤨191.52%
👎171.36%
💊151.20%
🔥151.20%
141.12%
🤪120.961%
🤬120.961%
❤‍🔥40.32%
🥱40.32%
👏30.24%
🥰30.24%
7 further kinds100.801%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈1,450 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот тут неловко получилось

😁89💯4👍1

29 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,560 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/SergeyKolyasnikov/79755 Знаете что не так в этой истории с ученым РАН. Вот пускай он даже усадил в тачку зловредных пиздюков, самых настоящих долбоебов, но как бы ситуация развивалась если бы его остановили в процессе езды сотрудники ГИБДД. Чем уважаемый академик думал? Ну вот предположим ситуацию, останавливают тебя сотрудники ГИБДД, в салоне сидят чужие дети. Как объяснять как они туда сели, куда т

🤡23👎14👍5💯4🍌1🤔1🤮1

29 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,290 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, а что там с КВАНТОВЫМИ КОМПЬЮТЕРАМИ которые матрицы там перемножали мгновенно, мол хоп и взломали любые шифры. По всему интернету бегали какие-то черти и внедряли постквантовое шифрование. Гугл так даже успел заявить, что достиг квантового превосходства. Может на этот квантовый компьютер героические ВКС ФАБ скинули или, как сраный сыр, бульдозером его раздавили? Молчит Сэм Альтман, молчит Карпатый, Брин сты

🤨19😁5🔥4👏3🤡1

29 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,320 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Забыли добавить что еще обязательно нужен ЕВРЕЙ, прям такой эталонный с плаката. Зачем именно не очень понятно, но почему-то всем положено по штату иметь.

😁34💯15🤡1

28 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈2,890 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А что реб Альтмана говорит про сингулярность? Является ли нахождение в сингулярности чем-то типа нахождения в микве. Кошерно ли правоверному иудею сидеть (стоять?) в сингулярности. Будет ли галахически правильно если вентиляторы видеокарт вращаются в субботу?

😁63❤‍🔥4🤬1

23 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,770 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне всегда очень нравится наблюдать в различных социальных сетях за подрейтузными формами жизни, которые мимикрируют "недовольного россиянина" с километровым чубом. Вот, русские, вы мне скажите почему у вас зарплаты скупились раза в три давно, а? Или вот второй деятель собрался вайбкодить "сайти".

😁58🤪12🤡41

9 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,290 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Русские вы зачем традиции гитлеризма предали?

😁45🥰3🦄1

2 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC≈4,310 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В голосяндру дал. Скорее всего на Марсе построили бы какой-то педофильскую базу с кодовым именем 57, где ебали бы детей и жрали человечину. А хуле от Земли далеко, в телескоп ты че там разглядишь кого там Билл Гейтс трогает за жопу, в паспорт не посмотришь, экспедицию с проверкой документов не отправишь, в общем ничего не сделаешь. В будущем все новые острова эптштейна будут только в космосе.

😁61💯35🥴2💩1🤣1

22 Jun 2026, 12:44 UTC≈4,220 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фильм Юрия Зайцмана. Напоминаю, что почти все звериные фамилии под вопросом, например может быть так что Соколов это не наш русский сокол, а ближневосточный гражданин черты оседлости из местечка Соко́лы. Единственная звериная фамилия к которой нет вопросов это Бобров. Сорокин или там Воронин может и на помойке питаться и в Петах-Тикву, если что, улететь, а вот наш русский бобр вынужден и помоек избегать и уплыть в И

😁545🤣5🤡1

19 Jun 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,560 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПОЛНАЯ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬНАЯ БАЗА от аккаунта который зарегался 15 июня, и тут же 15 июня сразу пошла писать губерния, посыпались разоблачения. Вся статья написана нейронкой вообще без каких-либо своих мыслей и состоит полностью из какой-то адовой херни, в духе "ну раз программа работает, значит что-то с ней не так". Все остальные статьи про разоблачения мессенджера "Максуд" или Рустора выходят тоже регулярно и состоят полн

💩26👍21😁12🤡3👎2💯1

17 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC≈4,890 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

>дядя с усами вроде Чубайса Вот так вот мы и узнали в 2026, что по-японски ЧУБАЙС и ГИТЛЕР это одно и то же слово. ДУМАЙТЕ.

😁55🤣31

8 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC≈4,930 views116 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Интересно как так вышло, что все реперы в РФ кошерные граждане в кипах, со всех сторон обматанные тфилинами и с огромными золотыми магендавидами на груди. Само, очевидно, так вырасти не могло. Значит выращено специально тусовочкой пугачихи. НО ЗАЧЕМ? Это же довольно смешно когда мальчик из хорошей семьи ближневосточных москвичей читает реп.

😁70🤣32💊92🤡2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @beatbarenboim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 945,180 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 110,675
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Моторний коzак” (@beatbarenboim), 1,609 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beatbarenboim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.