4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,515–2,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 18:15
2,520
-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:20
2,522
+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:53
2,519
+3
6 Aug 2026, 15:36
2,516
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.1%
avg views ÷ 2,520 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (21 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
28,279
Reactions total
475
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
475 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
214
45.1%
💔
114
24.0%
🕊
56
11.8%
❤🔥
42
8.84%
😭
27
5.68%
😢
10
2.11%
👏
8
1.68%
👎
4
0.842%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
گفتوگوی زینب و مردانِ خانه را به یاد دارید؟ در همین گیر و دار، جوانِ مشروطهخواه، به تدبیرِ زنانِ خانه، چادر بر سر میگیرد تا شناسایی نشود. او، خاموش، شاهدِ بگومگوی زینب و مردان است. پس از رفتن قزّاقها:
«جوان: من این داستان را برای جمعیتِ خُفیهٔ احرار، تعریف میکنم. امروز یادم نمیرود. همهچیز غریب بود امروز.
زینب [بیآنکه به جوان نگاه کند]: صبر کن! [دست به گلوبند میبرد. این گلوبند را رییسِ قزّاقها به زینب د…
غزّالی مینویسد:
«یکی را گفتند: "برادرِ تو از راهِ دین بگردید و اندر معصیتی افتاد. چرا از وی بِنَبُری؟"
گفت: "وی را به برادر، امروز حاجت است که افتاده است. دست از وی چون بدارم؟"»
به گمانم شرطِ محبّت همین است که آدمی فرا یادِ خویش آورد: «وی را به دوست، امروز حاجت است که افتاده است.» و الّا همپیالگی را همه میدانند.
#کیمیای_سعادت
اندرز شبانه:
«غم و کامِ دل بیگمان بگذرد
زمانه دمِ ما همی بشمرد
همان بِه که ما جامِ می بشمریم
بدین چرخِ نامهربان ننگریم»
گویی خیّام سخن میگوید. دم را غنیمت باید شمرد، که راهی جز این نیست:
«چنین است کردارِ گَردانسپهر
نه نامهربانیش پیدا، نه مهر»
#شاهنامه
مُرداد یا اَمُرداد؟
بیگمان صورتِ صحیحِ آن اَمُرداد است. این واژه (که نامِ ششمین اَمشاسپَندِ آیینِ زرتشتی است) در پهلوی amurdat، و در فارسیِ باستان a-mrtat است. از a (اَ) که پیشوندِ نفی است، و mrtat به معنای تباهی و مرگ. پس در مجموع یعنی: بیمرگی، فناناپذیری. (نقل از فرهنگِ ریشهشناختیِ استاد حسندوست. ایشان شانزده سال از عمرِ خویش را، شبانهروز و بیوقفه، در این راهِ دشوار و حوصلهسوز، نثارِ ایران کرد. تنها نگاهی گذ…
خیلی از اتفاقهای خوب از یه جمله شروع میشن: یه روز انجامش میدیم!
ما هم سه تا دوست بودیم که مدتها ایدههای مختلف تو سرمون میچرخید، چیزای مختلف رو تجربه میکردیم و آخرش یه روز گفتیم: خب، چرا خودمون یه فضا نسازیم برای همه چیزایی که دوست داریم؟
ما سه نفریم با علاقههای مختلف که یک نقطه مشترک داریم: ساختن تجربههای تازه.
ما اینجا جمع شدیم تا یه فضا بسازیم برای کشف کردن، یاد گرفتن، حرف زدن و خلق کردن.
"این بار" قراره ه…
«غمِ دل با تو گویم، غار!
بگو آیا مرا دیگر امیدِ رستگاری نیست؟
صدا نالنده پاسخ داد:
... ـآری نیست؟»
#اخوان
اخوان، یکی از شاهکارهای مسلّمِ خویش را به نامِ «قصّهٔ شهرِ سنگستان»، اینگونه به پایان میبرد: پژواک. پیچشِ صوت در دلِ غار، و تکرارِ بخشِ پایانیِ عبارتِ گوینده (رستگاری نیست؟) که پاسخی دردآلود میآفریند: آری نیست.
یونانیان، این انعکاسِ صوت در کوهستان را، با افسانهای توضیح دادهاند: اِکو (Echo)
یکی از پریان ب…
پیرِ فرزانهٔ طوس، همهٔ عمرِ خویش را پای شاهنامه نهاد. داشتههایش، یکایک، در این راه رفت و او آرام آرام، گرفتارِ تنگدستی شد.
در ابیاتی که او، فردوسی، دُرّ شاهوارِ دریای سخن، از فقرِ خویش میگوید، دلِ آدمی هزار پاره میشود. در آغاز داستان رستم و اسفندیار میگوید:
«هوا پرخروش و زمین پر ز جوش
خُنُک آن که دلْ شاد دارد به نوش
دِرَم دارد و نُقل و جامِ نبید
سرِ گوسفندی تواند بُرید
مرا نیست، فرّخ مر آن را که هست
ببخشای بر…
نامههای کوتاه شبانه.
«سلام.
شنیدهام که اهلِ ایمان را در آن نفسِ آخر، به قدرِ ذکری مجال میدهند.
فرصت دهند، به یادت خواهم گفت:
"جانم از تنگیِ این دل به لب آمد بیتو."
من، به طنینِ نامِ تو مؤمنم.»
#نامهها
#اوحدی
از بلای ویرانگرِ خودکامگی، فراوان گفتهاند و شنیدهاید. امّا خوسه دونوسو، در رمانِ خواندنیِ خویش، حکومت نظامی، از نظرگاهی متفاوت به موضوع نگریسته است:
«دیکتاتوری، سیاست را جوری به ما تحمیل کرده که انگار، تنها حرفِ آبرومندانهمان سیاست است و بس. تمام حرفهای دیگر را توی گلومان خفه میکنیم. در واقع با دغدغههای سیاسی، جلوِ دیدِ خودمان را میگیریم. اینجوری است که هیچ فکرِ دیگری توی ذهنمان ریشه نمیکند.»
و بدینسان، …
آه، تهمینه! از چه نامِ پدر با سهراب نمیگفتی؟
«و باز دیگر، اگر نامِ وی نمیگفتم، همه از آن بود
که مباد مهرِ وی تو را به ایران کشد.
آری، پدر بگزینی، و تهمینه فراموش کنی؛
همچنان که رستم کرد!»
#بهرام_بیضایی
💔28❤4🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @be_har_hal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 252,774 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شده دیگه” (@be_har_hal), 2,520 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/be_har_hal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.