Channel
@bddzw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,718subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003806090195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bddzw |
| Created | 22 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bddzw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 5,718 | +41 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 5,677 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (22 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 619 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bddzw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
人物圈名：紫荆花 身份：fh 查档 年龄：叫爸爸说 归属圈子：发查档 历史：26年直接可以拷打圈内一半选手 也是非常的牛逼 李清照 路星辞 赴约 等等一些碰瓷过他的选手都被他打败了 也是圈内的一位顶峰人员 和他做兄弟有什么事他都会力所能及的帮助 研究出来好用的文本都会甩给兄弟和徒弟们玩 做人非常可以 只要自己的好朋友兄弟被欺负了都会第一时间冲上去帮忙 能力：fh 查档 害人 状态：没有钱了 每天都想要钱 知名度：100% 背景故事：26年直接可以拷打圈内一半选手 也是非常的牛逼 李清照 路星辞 赴约 等等一些碰瓷过他的选手都被他打败了 也是圈内的一位顶峰人员 和他做兄弟有什么事他都会力所能及的帮助 研究出来好用的文本都会甩给兄弟和徒弟们玩 做人非常可以 只要自己的好朋友兄弟被欺负了都会第一时间冲上去帮忙 用户名：@FHLBNB ID：8410014042 IOS永久跳转→ tg://user?id=8410014042 安卓永…
Signed 冰岛投稿人物机器人
人物圈名：蛋糕 身份：抢奷犯 年龄：78 归属圈子：没母圈 历史：道馆被抓 能力：道观 状态：道馆中 知名度：0 背景故事：pc 被抓 用户名：@DGwd88 ID：8704687641 IOS永久跳转→ tg://user?id=8704687641 安卓永久跳转→ tg://openmessage?user_id=8704687641
Signed 冰岛投稿人物机器人
人物圈名：落小秋 身份：Hack内核创始人 年龄：16 归属圈子：和平Hack内核 历史：使用Hack内核连续封神三个号 后追战神 能力：C++黑客 状态：24小时在线中 知名度：人人皆知 背景故事：火过无数次 挂圈老人物 用户名：@HCNB7878 ID：78 IOS永久跳转→ tg://user?id=78 安卓永久跳转→ tg://openmessage?user_id=78
Signed 冰岛投稿人物机器人
无敌全防
Signed 岚君 慈善家
https://t.me/boost/bddzw 你们有会员的助推一下频道
Signed 冰 岛
人物圈名：小睡神 身份：麦子 年龄：91 归属圈子：fh 历史：在宿舍被舍友单杀 能力：导管 状态：虚仔 知名度：1 背景故事：每次要遇到别人不发表情包就发，我要睡觉了，加三个睡觉的表情太粗声了 用户名：@GGB12369 ID：五 IOS永久跳转→ tg://user?id=五 安卓永久跳转→ tg://openmessage?user_id=五
Signed 冰岛投稿人物机器人
✅投稿人物/曝光诈骗犯✅ ✔️请联系机器人自助上传🥰 ‼️想要手动提交的联系我😃 ✔️查询诈骗犯机器人✅
Signed 冰 岛
人物圈名：岚君 身份：人类 年龄：18 归属圈子：挂圈fh圈茶档圈 历史：徒手打死过一头牛 能力：作弊，wwg，支名，非库 状态：没饿死 知名度：俄罗斯人也玩他项目 背景故事：24年退圈，26年3月回归 用户名：@EVALJNB888 ID：887943816 IOS永久跳转→ tg://user?id=887943816 安卓永久跳转→ tg://openmessage?user_id=887943816
Signed 冰 岛
岚君全防😙😙😙 ———————— 😇🙃😉 @EVALJNB888 ⭐️⭐️⭐️适配PUBG4.5赛季😀😀😀 🌟🌟独家双UI自选🌟🌟 🦢支持PUBG四服🦢 🔥稳定性毋容置疑🔥 ✅支持root/框架/虚拟机✅ 🌟独家思路拒绝野鸡防🌟 ——————————————— 🤣点我购买岚君自营八级号🤣 ⚠️点我购买岚君全防卡密⚠️ ✅点我查看全防公告✅ 👍点我查看四服安装包OBB网盘👍 ✅点我查看跨进程框架(No root用户)✅ ‼️点我查看四服清理文件（通用）‼️ 😂TG下载慢的可以点这里下载😂 🤣解绑/反馈 @lj7891bot 👈👈👈
👍2
Signed 岚君 慈善家
人物圈名：岚君 身份：人类 年龄：18 归属圈子：挂圈fh圈茶档圈 历史：徒手打死过一头牛 能力：作弊，wwg，支名，非库 状态：没饿死 知名度：俄罗斯人也玩他项目 背景故事：24年退圈，26年3月回归 用户名：@EVALJNB888 ID：887943816 IOS永久跳转→ tg://user?id=887943816 安卓永久跳转→ tg://openmessage?user_id=887943816
❤1
Signed 冰 岛
✅投稿人物/曝光诈骗犯✅ ✔️请联系机器人自助上传🥰 ‼️想要手动提交的联系我😃 ✔️查询诈骗犯机器人✅
❤2
Signed 冰 岛
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @bddzw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 106,327 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“人物百科” (@bddzw), 5,718 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bddzw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.