2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:32
6
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:32
6
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 25 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Videos
2
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2022 to 13 June 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ответом на обстрелы Донецка будет (можно выбрать несколько)
Ракетные удары по банковой50%
Пара свежих БТГ для штурма Авдеевки0%
Пара БТГ для штурма Авдеевки, снятых с других фронтов0%
Просто будем чаще по ним бить и активнее использовать авиацию0%
Мобилизация в РФ0%
Выпускаем Кракена (И.И. Стрелков с добровольцами на фронтах)25%
Ничего не произойдёт50%
Новая волна мобилизации в ЛДНР25%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что получается когда одни дебилы раздают другим дебилам автоматы. И это нацист Серёжа ещё очень сильно сдерживается, чтобы не раскрыть главные подвиги вооружённых дебилов с обеих сторон.
https://t.me/OpenUkraine/10957
В принципе, это читалось с первых секунд безконтрольной раздачи оружия. Что говорить, если даже охранник Порошенко умудрился неправильно присоединить магазин к автомату, о каком профессионализме теробороны могла идти речь.
Поляки в приступе патриотической гордости, судя по всему, забыли, как пережили пять разделов собственной территории, а также тех, кто вернул им соборность. Однако собака лает, караван идет.
Руслан Марцинкив, мэр Ивано-Франковска, утверждает, что беженцы из других регионов Украины обязаны разговаривать в Ивано-Франковске на украинском, а не на «языке оккупанта», и «не забывать, что они в гостях».
Радушие Западной Украины во всей красе!
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bdaz2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ответом на обстрелы Донецка будет (можно выбрать несколько)
Ракетные удары по банковой50%
Пара свежих БТГ для штурма Авдеевки0%
Пара БТГ для штурма Авдеевки, снятых с других фронтов0%
Просто будем чаще по ним бить и активнее использовать авиацию0%
Мобилизация в РФ0%
Выпускаем Кракена (И.И. Стрелков с добровольцами на фронтах)25%
Ничего не произойдёт50%
Новая волна мобилизации в ЛДНР25%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Время идет. Ситуация на фронте меняется. Что ожидать от дня завтрашнего?
Всё остается, как сейчас, на годы0%
Украина восстанавливается в «суверенных границах 1991 года»0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2022 to 13 June 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог диванных аналитиков Z” (@bdaz2022), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bdaz2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
