Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БЧБ Киберотряд

Channel

БЧБ Киберотряд

@bchb_kiberotryad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002161208448
TypeChannel
Username@bchb_kiberotryad
DescriptionБелорусская хакерская группировка «БЧБ Киберотряд». Боремся за свободную и независимую Беларусь. Сольем весь режим
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bchb_kiberotryad

Growth

567 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:1656no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:4656first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 11 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥956.3%
212.5%
👍212.5%
🤡212.5%
😱16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2024 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 11:40 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья! 🚨 Мы контролируем все больше правительственных структур! (Делаем это тихо, чтобы нас не заметили.) 💔 Санкции против Беларуси снова вводятся! Промышленность, финансы, услуги, туризм и множество других сфер! действия режима снова ставят нас под удар. ... Самое обидное: власти снова решили прятать правду, враньят, что проблем нет... «Мы считаем целесообразным, чтобы белорусские органы государственного

🔥1

31 Oct 2025, 12:49 UTC169 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Гродненская область! Вот силовики, проверь соседа!

28 Oct 2025, 11:55 UTC187 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Брестская область! Вот силовики, проверь соседа! 🔍 #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad #силовики

8 Oct 2025, 12:32 UTC177 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Витебская область! Проверь соседа! Вот силовики в вашем регионе! ✉️Проводим голосование! Какая область будет следующей? ✉️ #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad #силовики

1

16 Sept 2025, 12:28 UTC245 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Гомельская область! Вот силовики в вашем регионе! Проверь соседа! Болницы должны лучше защищать данные пациентов! Жди следующую партию!✌🏻 #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad #силовики

🔥3👍1

31 Mar 2025, 10:18 UTC200 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

❌Беларусским компаниям запрещается поставки своего производства в Россию!❌ Российские компании зарабатывают на продаже военной техники в Беларусь, но Беларусским компаниям запрещается поставки своего производства в Россию, чтобы не вредить российской экономике. Это несправедливый подход и эксплуатация нашего государства! Мы требуем положить конец этой несправедливости, а также дать возможность беларусским компаниям

🔥21

23 Jan 2025, 13:54 UTC329 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Очень плохо, это ещё один зловещий признак. Даже больных теперь будут в армию брать? #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad

🔥2😱1

22 Jan 2025, 13:22 UTC267 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кровь! Тревожно, зачем приказали хранить такое большое количество крови? Судя по данным за последние годы, это не хороший признак. Интересно, возможно, что они к чему-то готовятся? #кровь #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad

15 Jan 2025, 13:42 UTC170 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Нам повезло, а теперь посмотрим к чему они готовятся! Р.S. Режим заботится о здоровье силовиков... Все правоохранителные органы имеют обеспеченную охрану здоровья, а что с обычными гражданами? #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad

14 Jan 2025, 13:14 UTC350 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Зачем власти покупают хлороформ? Есть ли здесь какой-то химик? Для чего им нужна такая большая партия этого? #хлороформ #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad

🔥1

7 Jan 2025, 12:25 UTC202 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сеанс №1001 Сеанс ВКС ДСП с участием Президента Республики Беларусь #ЕРСПД #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad

30 Dec 2024, 13:29 UTC374 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Услуга ВКС ДСП Услуга по передаче служебной информации ограниченного распространения с обеспечением передачи видеоизображений, голоса, показа презентаций участникам видеоконференции в режиме реального времени на основе закрытых сетей, построенных на технологии TCP\IP, с использованием защищенного сегмента ЕРСПД. #ЕРСПД #bchb_kiberotryad #freebelarus #cyberwar #kiberotryad

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bchb_kiberotryad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,067,384 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БЧБ Киберотряд” (@bchb_kiberotryad), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bchb_kiberotryad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.