Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BBG / Beauty by Grebenkova

@bbg_news

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,682subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001405026439
TypeChannel
Username@bbg_news
Created11 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bbg_news

Growth

3,6823,6903,6867 August 2026 — 3,687 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,687 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,690 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,687 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,682 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,681–3,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:163,682-5
10 Aug 2026, 18:073,687-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:043,690+3
7 Aug 2026, 13:183,687no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:063,687first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 3,682 subscribers
Avg views / post
581
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held7 (27 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total4,068
Reactions total246
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14458.5%
🔥5321.5%
😱197.72%
🙈114.47%
👏41.63%
😍31.22%
🤯31.22%
🥰31.22%
👌20.813%
👍20.813%
😁20.813%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC407 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @promakeuplaboratoryPhoto

Делимся важной новостью В связи с пожарами на складах Wildberries часть продукции PROMAKEUP laboratory была утрачена. Мы постоянно поддерживаем связь с партнерами и стараемся оперативно восстановить поставки, чтобы вернуть вам прежние комфорт и удобство. Приглашаем вас к покупке любимых продуктов на сайтах «Только тебе», «Золотое яблоко» и «Озон». Берегите себя, для нас это важнее любой косметики.

30🙈5

2 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC504 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я очень редко ем не дома (кроме вынужденных случаев). С момента знакомства с мужем все мои похождения по общепитам прекратились. Он прекрасно готовит, мне нравится готовить для него и собирать ему еду на рабочие сутки, он это ценит, целует мне руки, готовит шикарные завтраки и романтические ужины, и желания пойти куда-то поесть у нас все меньше и меньше (пока, во всяком случае). Кроме того, сказывается мое постоянно

35😱17🤯3👍2🙈1

30 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC678 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну и вот вам второй вариант на выбор, у которого финиш помады более бархатный. Именно бархат, не матовый, от которого тоже очень красиво отражается свет 😍 Подписывайтесь, здесь только то, что доказано наукой, а не маркетологами 📋 Сообщество в VK Канал VK Канал MAX Канал Tg

21🙈1

30 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC620 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сказать, что я ворвалась в рабочие будни - ничего не сказать 😁 Я обязательно на выходных напишу сюда что-нибудь интересное и очень полезное! А пока работа любимая ❤️ Как вам такой финиш помады на губах? Без относительно бренда. Сексуально актуально? Красиво? Может надоело? Несовременно? Сложно? Хочется носить? Напишите свои ощущения, пожалуйста. Пользуетесь вообще классической помадой? 💄 🤔 Я очень люблю, но могу

19🔥4😁2🙈1

29 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC567 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @promakeuplaboratoryPhoto

Не пропустите🤍

14😍3👏2🔥2🙈1

27 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC658 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥234👏2😱2🙈1

27 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC634 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы в Москве! Это краткий итог и мои выводы о прошедшем отпуске ) Как сказал супруг: хорошо, что ты все время фотографировала, жена, а то столько событий и впечатлений, что я уже не помню, что было несколько дней назад 🙈 Да, частая смена картинки - несомненный плюс. Как и машина в путешествии, которая дает тебе независимость в перемещениях. Но я устала) и от руля и от постоянного расписанного тайминга. Такие поездки

🔥2421🥰3👌2🙈1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bbg_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BBG / Beauty by Grebenkova” (@bbg_news), 3,682 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbg_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.