Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Baxx Studio | Claude GameDev

Channel

Baxx Studio | Claude GameDev

@baxxstudio

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,544subscribers

+1,527 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002102840343
TypeChannel
Username@baxxstudio
DescriptionНеобычные игры, безумные механики, нейросети и мемы. Всё лучшее из геймдева. Сотрудничество - @Ilya01s Лучший чат по Unity - https://t.me/+UXfZgXjz5IxmN2Q6 Тематический чат Unity Core - https://t.me/+DLJ0UOtdc7VjZGYy https://telega.in/c/baxxstudio
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/baxxstudio

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@baxxstudio/4930 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC@unity_assets_1/12515 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC1.002 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@unity_assets_115 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0039 minutesthis entry (11–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 201 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,9538,5447,748.56 August 2026 — 7,017 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,012 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,018 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,004 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,982 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,969 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,953 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,983 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,980 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,977 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,980 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,984 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,997 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,000 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,026 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,147 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,590 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,552 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,533 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,934 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,030 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,019 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,029 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,019 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,013 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,544 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,527. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,714–8,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 10:008,544+531
6 Nov 2026, 20:578,013-6
4 Nov 2026, 00:268,019-10
1 Nov 2026, 01:018,029+10
29 Oct 2026, 04:288,019-11
26 Oct 2026, 08:378,030+96
23 Oct 2026, 12:547,934+401
20 Oct 2026, 15:007,533-19
17 Oct 2026, 23:367,552-38
14 Oct 2026, 22:267,590+443
11 Oct 2026, 23:377,147+121
5 Oct 2026, 08:597,026+26
27 Sept 2026, 14:207,000+3
17 Sept 2026, 20:026,997+13
13 Sept 2026, 12:206,984+4
9 Sept 2026, 18:576,980+3
4 Sept 2026, 18:416,977-3
29 Aug 2026, 11:076,980-3
26 Aug 2026, 00:146,983+30
22 Aug 2026, 18:166,953first reading

Engagement

287 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.99%
avg views ÷ 8,544 subscribers
Avg views / post
854
221 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
222
of 287 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held287 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total188,683
Reactions total4,338
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈2,620
Links
≈3,770

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 59m
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 118 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,357 reactions across 279 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,66431.1%
🤣1,08820.3%
❤61011.4%
custom 52354650739709203885309.89%
😁2494.65%
🤩2164.03%
👍1623.02%
🤬1482.76%
😱1432.67%
🤔1222.28%
😢1132.11%
🤯851.59%
🫡761.42%
❤‍🔥510.952%
😡220.411%
⚡160.299%
🥰160.299%
🙏110.205%
💯100.187%
🤷‍♂70.131%
7 further kinds180.336%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 285 of the 287 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,504 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 286 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @baxxstudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 287 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.697%
2 of 287 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,040
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
805
over 284 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxAjJ1419 November 20269 November 2026
2W5zFGBvcyY111 November 202611 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 61 of 222 posts held from the last 30 days (27.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC749 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Округ во Флориде выложил геймплей GTA 6, и его путают с реальной съёмкой Ролик опубликовал аккаунт округа Дейд, и зрители разделились, одни увидели нейросеть, другие живые кадры. Но похоже, это всё же настоящая игра, ведь Rockstar сама сделала репост. Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

custom 523546507397092038815🔥8😱2❤1

11 Nov 2026, 19:01 UTC804 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Claude Code теперь сам работает как целая игровая студия: 49 агентов от директоров до тестировщиков. Они проверяют код, спорят о дизайне и не закрывают задачу, пока не запустят игру и не сохранят скриншот. 🔗 GitHub: Claude-Code-Game-Studios #ai #tool #code #github Assets Free. Подписаться.

🔥9❤2❤‍🔥2🤔1

11 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC922 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, вы в IT? Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

🤣21❤1

11 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC979 views20 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Claude Fable 5.2 за 2,9 часа сделал шутер с графикой AAA Игра на движке Kun-Zhi, все модели, текстуры и звук создала нейросеть. Промпт был такой: Сделай мне FPS на движке Kun-Zhi. Назови его Kun-Zhi-Line. Безумно детальное качество, пожалуйста, чтобы визуально тянуло на AAA. Сделай его маленьким по масштабу (типа крошечного уровня), но в остальном с впечатляющей фотореалистичной графикой. С первого раза нейросеть …

custom 523546507397092038812🔥3🤣3❤1🤯1

11 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,040 views16 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGBvcyYPhoto

Надоело каждый раз объяснять ИИ, как тебе отвечать? Godlike GPT — ИИ-ассистент прямо в Telegram, который один раз запоминает, каким ему быть: 🔧 Пресеты: настрой роль и стиль («ты — мой SMM-щик», «отвечай коротко и по делу») и вызывай нужную одним #тегом 🔎 Ищет свежую информацию в интернете и читает сайты по ссылке 🎨 Рисует с нуля и редактирует твои фото и даже стикеры 📄 Читает PDF, Word и другие текстовые файлы ✏️ …

🔥7😁6❤2🤩1

11 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,070 views19 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Разраб навайбкодил в Claude Fable 5.2 битву с главарём в духе Dark Souls, сыграть можно прямо в браузере Автор kevin_t_ngo Поиграть можно: тут Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

🔥12❤4🤩2⚡1

11 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Claude Fable 5.2 за час навайбкодил игру, нарисованную 1,5 млн мазков кисти Разработчик Blendi показал игру, где каждый кадр состоит примерно из 1,5 миллиона штрихов, и при этом она выдаёт 200 fps прямо во вкладке браузера. Код игры автор выложил в открытый доступ. Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

🔥16❤5🤩4

11 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,820 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Команда patch.gg бесплатно раздаёт 50 000 моделей, звуков и музыки для игр В каталоге есть и готовые системы: генератор ландшафта, физика и езда на машине. Нейронки сами ищут нужное через MCP. Забрать можно тут. Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

🔥9🤩3❤2

11 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,240 views36 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Claude теперь банит даже жителей других стран, если они работают на российскую фирму Раньше Anthropic смотрела только на то, где ты сидишь. С завтрашнего дня будут проверять и работодателя: живёшь в Сербии или Грузии, но компания зарегистрирована в России, значит рабочий доступ отрубят. То же самое ждёт и зарубежные фирмы, если ими в основном владеют или управляют из России или Китая. Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

custom 523546507397092038827🔥8👍1

11 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,110 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

🤣26

11 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,080 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Художница сделала из скелета Baldur's Gate 3 Мику, и Студия её не простила Официальный аккаунт разработчиков попросил автора арта держаться подальше от игры, а извинения не принял. Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

😁17🤣5custom 52354650739709203883😱1

11 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,150 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Claude Fable 5.2 оказался единственной нейросетью, которая смогла просто промолчать Пользователь попросил нейросеть вообще ничего ему не отвечать. Opus, Sonnet и Haiku всё равно что-то писали: обещали не издавать ни звука или извинялись, что не справились. А Fable 5.2 показал только свои размышления, и сам ответ оставил пустым. Baxx Studio. Подписаться.

❤14🤣7custom 52354650739709203883😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 287 posts we hold for @baxxstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@baxxstudio edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Unity & Unreal | GameDev
@unity_gamedev_unreal · 32,472
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Baxx Studio | Claude GameDev” (@baxxstudio), 8,544 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baxxstudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.