Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

адвокат дьявола

@batmadethat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

231subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639001961
TypeChannel
Username@batmadethat
DescriptionПо всем вопросам и по заказам писать - @actual_bat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/batmadethat

Growth

2317 Aug 2026, 04:03 — 231 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:18 — 231 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:037 Aug 2026, 04:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:18231no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:03231first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.8%
avg views ÷ 231 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,904
Reactions total317
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
932
Videos
52
Links
93

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

317 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52379656082256344599630.3%
custom 52738937226212289128225.9%
custom 52382011571170503667523.7%
custom 52378103193880811974614.5%
custom 5238114665065641709144.42%
custom 524043894245245243641.26%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC61 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тарталетка из жизнь марта, нарисованная моей голодной фантазией

custom 523781031938808119711custom 52382011571170503664custom 52738937226212289121

6 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC61 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Картхолдер за все это время почти ежедневного пикания все также хорош

custom 52738937226212289129custom 52382011571170503663custom 52378103193880811972

6 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC61 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52738937226212289128custom 52382011571170503662custom 52378103193880811971

3 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC86 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЕВОЧКИ, МОЛИМСЯ, МНЕ ОСТАЛАСЬ ВСЕГО ТРЕТЬЯ ЧАСТЬ ВИДЕО ПРО КРАУЗЕРА ДЛЯ МОНТАЖА...... я эти 13 минут монтирую уже месяц в час по чайной ложке, как же туго идет просто жесть а ща с спать... завтра рано на работу....

custom 527389372262122891214custom 52379656082256344591custom 52382011571170503661custom 52404389424524524361

2 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC117 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На ночь вам задание: найти айпад Сложность: безумно

custom 527389372262122891221custom 52382011571170503665custom 52378103193880811972custom 52379656082256344591

2 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC110 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какие вы активные последнее время, спасибо вам, мои хорошки....

custom 527389372262122891215custom 52382011571170503662custom 52378103193880811971custom 52379656082256344591

2 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC110 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня увидела такой в жизнь марте и не могу теперь перестать о нем думать Это ещё не конечный результат

custom 523796560822563445920custom 52378103193880811978custom 52382011571170503662custom 52738937226212289121

2 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC107 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

lowkey ранняя версия мне нравятся больше

custom 52379656082256344599custom 52378103193880811976custom 52738937226212289122custom 52382011571170503661

2 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC139 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Монеточка сгенерировала клип и заявила, что современная анимация так сделать не сможет, ведь ей хотелось эффекта "аутентичной вхс-камеры" Смотрю и пытаюсь понять, что здесь такого, чего не сможет современный 3д-художник или аниматор

custom 523820115711705036610custom 52378103193880811971custom 52381146650656417091

31 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC115 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как же славно иметь гиперфикс на своей работе екалемене

custom 523796560822563445914custom 52378103193880811973custom 52382011571170503661

31 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC119 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как человек, который занимается редкими книгами по работе, редкие - это не только оригиналы рукописей, но и в целом старые книги, которые не перевыпускались позднее, также как и периодика, в том числе и статьи и рассказы. То, что на первый взгляд кажется ненужным и не важным в итоге может оказаться важным артефактом для истории конкретного региона, технологии, быта и прочее. Например, на фото книжка с 1935 года. Ту

custom 523796560822563445915custom 52378103193880811973custom 52382011571170503662

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @batmadethat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 900,108 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“адвокат дьявола” (@batmadethat), 231 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/batmadethat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.