Channel
@basyachannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002421990871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @basyachannel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/basyachannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 199 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 200 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 200 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (16 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,308 |
| Reactions total | 261 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
286 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5303285687066324993 | 65 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5240178822053131540 | 64 | 22.4% | |
| custom 5400246579523249933 | 60 | 21.0% | |
| custom 5440664120154148940 | 43 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5399983529956234850 | 28 | 9.79% | |
| custom 5447309430993467719 | 20 | 6.99% | |
| custom 5382180594161577876 | 5 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5467864989853313657 | 1 | 0.35% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
guys он все еще в очень начальной стадии, поэтому я надеюсь, что хотя б к середине августа закончу! ! но я очень рада что вы ждете, мне приятно что вам это реально интересно 😊 сорри по приезде бедроттила чуть меньше недели и занималась важными делишками, поэтому ток недавно взялась за него💔 мне очень стыдно честно
custom 54473094309934677196custom 54406641201541489402
мне кажется они не рады
custom 54002465795232499338custom 52401788220531315405custom 54406641201541489404
активно работаю над влогом, а пока вот вам еще мини милашность 😊
custom 539998352995623485011custom 53032856870663249936custom 54473094309934677194
если что я уже в тюмени!! если у вас есть какие-то вопросы касательно китая и моего визита туда, можете написать под этим постом или в анонке!! на все отвечу во влоге как смонтирую его😊
custom 53032856870663249933custom 54002465795232499332
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 524017882205313154011custom 53032856870663249937custom 54406641201541489402custom 54473094309934677191
furrrrrrrrrrrr…..😊
custom 540024657952324993316custom 52401788220531315409custom 53032856870663249938custom 54473094309934677191
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 530328568706632499310custom 52401788220531315409custom 54473094309934677196custom 53999835299562348501
сорри за спам гайс, моя маленькая девочка внутри умирает от счастья и хочет делиться этим с вами
custom 539998352995623485013custom 53032856870663249939custom 54002465795232499334custom 54406641201541489401
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53032856870663249939custom 52401788220531315408custom 54406641201541489403custom 54473094309934677191
ей всегда нравились твинки….
custom 530328568706632499312custom 54406641201541489409custom 54002465795232499334custom 53999835299562348501
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54002465795232499338custom 54406641201541489404custom 53032856870663249931custom 54473094309934677191
я хочу поделиться этим со всеми Я ПОКУШАЛА МОЕ МОЕ ОМЛЕТ В КАФЕ С ГОРНИЧНЫМИ!!!!!!!! И ОДНА ГОРНИЧНАЯ ПОИГРАЛАСЬ СО МНОЙ В КИТАЙСКУЮ СЧИТАЛОЧКУ
custom 544066412015414894018custom 524017882205313154016custom 54002465795232499336custom 53999835299562348501
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @basyachannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 305,874 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“*˖•. басяша 🍙！！” (@basyachannel), 199 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basyachannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.