2026年08月06日扒叔CJ日报第232期 本文约 903 字,预计阅读时长 3 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 晴儿体验反馈与被放鸽子经历 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 晴儿 服务评价 放鸽子 狼友A: 晴儿真不错,263那个。服务非常可以,刚从上海会所出来几天。除了大以外所有要求基本都满足,人也健谈,颜值不说多好看肯定够用。口可以但不爆,我觉得也够了。 狼友B: 被晴儿放鸽子了,约的11点20。说是过敏了。 狼友C: 我约的10点,都快到了也没了,咱俩一块被放了。 2. Coco初体验评价 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) Coco 双井 嫩妹 狼友A: Coco挺好的,我上午刚去。基本就是照…

Channel
8叔CJ日报
@bashucj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
667subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003433293361 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bashucj |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bashucj |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 667 | -3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 670 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 673 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 674 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 675 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 678 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 679 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 680 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 681 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 681 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
2026年08月05日扒叔CJ日报第231期 本文约 1112 字,预计阅读时长 3 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 亿可体验反馈:瘦、真熊、敏感 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 亿可 体验 狼友A: 亿可我是真的很喜欢,喜欢瘦的可以去。真熊还大,34小脚,敏感。脖推很爽,就是没口。B骑脸,腿锁固,窒息,大B兜抽,还可以圣水灌嘴。 狼友B: 我离亿可很近,骑车10来分钟,一直想去。 2. 悠悠体验反馈:7张偏贵,年龄存疑 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 悠悠 评价 狼友A: 昨天去悠悠了,感觉还行,7张有点多,6张合适。 狼友B: 年龄偏大,25是假的,30多了。正规流程中规中矩,个不高,屁股皮肤有…
❤1
2026年08月04日扒叔CJ日报第230期 本文约 411 字,预计阅读时长 1 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 蓝婉儿因服务问题被要求整改 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 蓝婉儿 整改 狼友A: 之前有评价说他服务差点意思。 狼友B: 蓝婉儿 已经要求整改了。 狼友C: 要不你就试试蓝婉儿,试试整改后怎么样。 2. Jack King探店兮兮身材服务评价 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 兮兮 身材服务 狼友A: 刚从兮兮那出来了,fw不错,时间略短,人有点胖,目测130+,4张水准吧。 狼友A: 兮兮个子矮,目测不到160,就算没有130也得120了,小肚子快成游泳圈了都。 3. 天津女仆尺…
2026年08月03日扒叔CJ日报第229期 本文约 354 字,预计阅读时长 1 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 奶茶妹妹火爆与果乐茶改名 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 奶茶 甜甜 服务评价 狼友A: 在@q3625667694 罚站 20 分钟了,我看要等多久。 而且我怀疑是代聊,她那现在太火了,说前一位还没走。 狼友B: 奶茶抢到了,奶茶可以品鲍吗? 果乐茶改名字了吧,改成甜甜了。 2. 言汐芊芊韩欣妮对比 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 言汐 芊芊 韩欣妮 狼友A: 言汐和芊芊推荐哪个,颜值言夕高一点胸芊芊大一点各有优势。 尺度都可以都很好。 狼友B: 韩欣妮韩欣彤姐妹俩都挺年轻的,也还不…
2026年07月31日扒叔CJ日报第228期 本文约 1296 字,预计阅读时长 4 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 安娜服务评价与经历 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) #安娜 丰台 毒龙 服务一般 狼友A: 安娜有人去过吗?这个老师服务怎么样?我看评论说毒龙特别好。 安娜之前在丰台时候约过一次,一般般哦,人照不符。 2. 雨儿真实感受与拉黑事件 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) #雨儿 作业 真实感受 玻璃心 狼友A: 写了个作业被雨儿拉黑了。我还觉得自己是写的好评。 说一点实话都不行了。我觉得评论很中肯啊。 主要现在看兄弟们的车评,全都是好评,感觉真不好参考了。 盲猜年龄不小这句。不是怎么知道你发的作…
2026年07月30日扒叔CJ日报第227期 本文约 407 字,预计阅读时长 1 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 心柔服务体验与联系方式 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) #心柔 服务好 良家感 水墨拉丝 狼友A: 心柔服务很顶,良家型注重学生体验,课排松一天只接四个。皮肤又嫩又滑,真想抱着日,可惜没大。敏感度高,比芊芊还敏感。 狼友B: 心柔怎么联系啊,刚刚cj完成寿寺奶茶。服务好呗水墨拉丝爽翻了,尺度也大,长相个人感觉挺不错。 2. 单纯老师评价与遭遇 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) #单纯 态度问题 拉黑 超值控制 狼友A: 这个垃圾昨天白嫖单纯老师,给老师气的都准备回家了。硬件还不错,但对单纯…
2026年07月29日扒叔CJ日报第226期 本文约 403 字,预计阅读时长 1 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 婉儿姐妹对比与推荐 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 婉儿 表姐妹 骚 中尺参考 狼友A: 嗯,比起来婉儿更好,个人喜好。本来想约的,看月亮哥没推荐,有点犹豫了。这俩姐妹表姐妹关系。 想找个骚点的中尺,参考婉儿。糖果佳佳尺度咋样。 狼友B: 花满楼那个群,靠谱吗?得辨别,他家榜上的还好点,要是不在榜要慎重。 2. 黎大夫技术与价格 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 黎大夫 前高 技术 价格上涨 狼友A: 黎大夫前高,归责,喷的跟喷泉一样。黎大夫在太阳宫那会儿也就400,前高啥的,技术好?现在…
狼友A: @xx369912 小雪 我出来玩这么多年从来没见过这么傻逼的人,真是给我气的都不知道说什么好了,她 171 我 165 本来我就不想找太高的,奈何最近没有看的顺眼的,从进门一开始先盯着我看半天然后在那笑我也不知道是嘲讽还是什么意思,问她也不说,也不给拿鞋换鞋,这都无所谓,上来就盯着我要钱没有任何互动,这我也能接受,让我去洗漱也不给放水,我也不在乎,在她卫生间上个厕所就问我怎么在家没上厕所,这问题我都不知道怎么回答,难道我能随时控制肚子疼的时间吗,我在那洗她就盯着我洗,他妈的洗完了连一次性浴巾也不给拿,我出去找一圈才看见,上床上就开始研究我身上的几个疤,小时候长大留的,我找过那么多老师也没像她这样的,然后问我谁让我来的,我真尼玛服了,跟她聊天到这地方还能谁让我来的,然后开始研究我二弟,因为之前割过包皮所以没那么好看,割过的应该都知道,她还以为我有什么性病,我说不行把钱退我我走人,他不乐意说她都脱光了,我说看你脱衣服还收…
2026年07月28日扒叔CJ日报第225期 本文约 2508 字,预计阅读时长 7 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 亚运村九儿配合服务评价 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) #九儿 亚运村 配合度高 狼友A: 亚运村九儿 我觉得挺好的之前沟通好 出击 一进来就要水费 当时觉得完了被坑了 但是交完水费超级的配合 怎么亲怎么🐍都行 一点都不抗拒 也不躲 有点内向 能承受我这样野蛮的狼 觉得不容易了 哈哈哈 我可是抱的紧紧的又亲又🐍又摸 提前要水费 表示谅解 怕狼友不给钱白嫖跑了 估计她碰到过 因为确实有妹子跟我说过 人家九儿这么配合我了 那我还要啥自行车 对吧 2. 北京老师避坑价格整理 (来 @bashumalata…
2026年07月19日扒叔CJ日报第224期 本文约 95 字,预计阅读时长 1 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 避雷重点:拿钱跑路与玛丽亚是托 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 玛丽亚 王老师 拿钱跑路 狼友A: 别听王老师造谣,警惕其言论。 那个玛丽亚是托,明确点名需警惕。 狼友B: 拿钱跑了,疑似交易后跑路。 没什么雷踩了,可忽略其他。
2026年07月17日扒叔CJ日报第222期 本文约 753 字,预计阅读时长 2 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 泰享回复慢不如直接问上游 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 泰享 上游 回复慢 狼友A: 泰享回复太慢了,还不如直接问上游😂 狼友B: 可以找上午不开的老师,时间上比较好约。 2. 苦瓜哥推荐与翻身老师 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 苦瓜哥 翻身靠她 推荐 狼友A: 玄幻,苦瓜哥也行,可以试试。 狼友B: 翻身靠她,这个老师确实不错。 3. 小泽尺寸正好的正面评价 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 小泽 尺寸 好评 狼友A: 小泽的C对我来说就正好,体验挺舒服的。 4…
❤1
2026年07月16日扒叔CJ日报第221期 本文约 499 字,预计阅读时长 1 分钟 8叔CJ日报:@bashucj 8叔吃瓜吹牛社:@bashumalatang 8叔老师记事本:@bashubilei 老师查询机器人:@bashuvote_bot 8叔私聊机器人:@bashuvote_bot 1. 避雷预警:脆皮、流子、水硕等需远离 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 脆皮 流子 水硕 仙人跳 避雷 狼友A: 远离脆皮,这人名声在外了。 狼友B: 仙人跳要注意,付定一律不去,这纯骗钱。拒绝照骗骗子别来。 狼友C: 流子和水硕都要避开,喜欢流子的被骗炮好几次了。不要混进哥布林赛道,都是哥布林。 2. 硬件推荐与价格讨论 (来 @bashumalatang 讨论) 夏雨 硬件 价格 狼友A: 硬件很顶,可以冲,她值得,真有魅力。可以涨价了。 狼友B: 月底15000?夏雨?这价格有点猛。 狼友C…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bashucj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“8叔CJ日报” (@bashucj), 667 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bashucj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.