🔵 NAINCY Entered BASE TRENDING! #8 Contract: 0x94A47Aa810E85190Fed418892EcbD68D5f463Ff4 Telegram: nAIncytrades 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🥰1

Channel
@basetrendinginfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
655subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001879686933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @basetrendinginfo |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/basetrendinginfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 655 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 655 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 23 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔵 NAINCY Entered BASE TRENDING! #8 Contract: 0x94A47Aa810E85190Fed418892EcbD68D5f463Ff4 Telegram: nAIncytrades 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🥰1
🔵 VIVI Entered BASE TRENDING! #6 Contract: 0x94A47Aa810E85190Fed418892EcbD68D5f463Ff4 Telegram: VIVI’s Portal 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
❤1
🔵 FROC Entered BASE TRENDING! #7 Contract: 0x3C8cd0dB9a01EfA063a7760267b822A129bc7DCA Telegram: FROC OFFICIAL 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
👍1
🔵 Broak Entered BASE TRENDING! #3 Contract: 0x02537463e57a44f861Ee861Ba4F590C413f984a6 Telegram: Broak on Base 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
👍2
🔵 BCIK Entered BASE TRENDING! #10 Contract: 0x37d8fc80B4c6Fdb7e4b5C8d811C6D952feE41E9a Telegram: Baby Christ Is King 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
👍1
🔵 noice Entered BASE TRENDING! #10 Contract: 0x9Cb41FD9dC6891BAe8187029461bfAADF6CC0C69 Telegram: noice 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🔵 COAT Entered BASE TRENDING! #3 Contract: 0x620e617aDBd41608F858d4191282945E67724b07 Telegram: Coat Dog Portal 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🔵 SKITTEN Entered BASE TRENDING! #8 Contract: 0x4B6104755AfB5Da4581B81C552DA3A25608c73B8 Telegram: $SKITTEN OFFICIAL -- Portal 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🔵 SATO Entered BASE TRENDING! #9 Contract: 0x5A70bE406ce7471A44F0183B8D7091F4Ad751db5 Telegram: SATO | BASE ( 0x5A70 ) 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🔵 BUBU Entered BASE TRENDING! #10 Contract: 0x2C001233eD5E731B98B15B30267F78C7560b71f2 Telegram: BUBU 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🔵 BOBR Entered BASE TRENDING! #4 Contract: 0x2531ec1720E5d1bC82052585271D4BE3f43E392F Telegram: Based $BOBR Portal 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
🔵 FROC Entered BASE TRENDING! #5 Contract: 0x3C8cd0dB9a01EfA063a7760267b822A129bc7DCA Telegram: FROC OFFICIAL 🔵 Chart 🔵 Trending 🔵 Website
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @basetrendinginfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 463,664 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@basetrendinginfo named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Base Trending info” (@basetrendinginfo), 655 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basetrendinginfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.