Channel
@barnettforcongress
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
413subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440984255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @barnettforcongress |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/barnettforcongress |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 413 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 417 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 418 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 418 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
94 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 31.9% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 21.3% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 8.51% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 4.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Who do you want to see as the next Chair of the Republican Party in Arizona?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Vote “For” through RTS to create a fairer environment for private and charter schools in comparison to public schools. Currently, public schools receive $15,000 per student, while private and charter institutions only get $7,500 through the Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA). It is essential that families choosing private, charter, or home schooling have access to School Tuition Organizations (STOs) to ensure they…
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤2
So, public schools get $14,673 per pupil with a combination of local, state, and federal money. A kid wanting to attend a private school will have access to ESA money at $7500 OR they can go the route of getting money through a STO which is a scholarship tuition organization The problem is that the kid wanting to attend a private school cannot use the ESA money and then make up the difference through the STO becaus…
👍4
#cancer #fcancer #oncologists the challenge is on. I’m sick of what I’m seeing from a corrupt, greed driven system. @rondesantis @caseydesantis
❤8
ARS 15-2410 (B)(3) should be repealed due to its flawed premise that individuals seeking private school education are "double dipping." While families can utilize ESA funds for private schooling, they are prohibited from accessing additional financial support through scholarship tuition organizations, which limits their options. In contrast, public schools receive nearly $15,000 per student from various funding sourc…
❤4👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
The U.S. House of Representatives only needs a simple majority to impeach a federal judge. Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution grants the House the sole power of impeachment, and the process requires a majority vote—meaning more than half of the members present and voting, assuming a quorum (218 out of 435 if all seats are filled). For example, if 430 members are present, 216 votes would be enough…
👍7🔥1
Hey, @HouseGOP the Judicial coup will continue until you grow a pair of balls and start impeaching these corrupt Judges. We can get it done in the House and expose their corruption in hearings for the public to see then it's up to the Senate. Democrats can then show the world they are protecting corrupt Judges. Impeach in the House! If it was the other way around the Democrats would have already been doing it!!!
🔥5
We can’t let this happen. I’m with Chaplik on this
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
https://x.com/BarnettforAZ/status/1888973165646549235
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @barnettforcongress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who do you want to see as the next Chair of the Republican Party in Arizona?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2025 to 19 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@barnettforcongress named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Barnett For AZ” (@barnettforcongress), 413 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barnettforcongress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.