Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for барда

Channel

барда

@bardaEKB

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

347subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002348899847
TypeChannel
Username@bardaEKB
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bardaEKB

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

332347339.56 August 2026 — 332 subscribers6 August 2026 — 332 subscribers7 August 2026 — 333 subscribers14 August 2026 — 334 subscribers22 August 2026 — 337 subscribers29 August 2026 — 338 subscribers7 September 2026 — 343 subscribers14 September 2026 — 347 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 40 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 330–349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 23:16347+4
7 Sept 2026, 10:59343+5
29 Aug 2026, 09:03338+1
22 Aug 2026, 11:15337+3
14 Aug 2026, 17:48334+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:03333+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:47332no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:33332first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

579 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19233.2%
custom 522467405024411642316428.3%
custom 590912303642182312611319.5%
🕊559.50%
🐳193.28%
👍172.94%
🆒111.90%
👻71.21%
☃10.173%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC214 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Шоу Бина

custom 522467405024411642333custom 590912303642182312610👻6🕊2🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC194 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 522467405024411642334🐳13custom 59091230364218231265🕊3☃1

4 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC179 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

новые значки!!

❤33🕊6🆒6custom 52246740502441164231

3 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC197 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

барда стикерпак

❤24🐳4custom 52246740502441164233🕊2

3 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC201 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍17custom 52246740502441164235🕊2❤1custom 59091230364218231261

2 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC232 views62 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💃

custom 590912303642182312636custom 522467405024411642311🕊9❤3🆒3

1 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC257 views70 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩

custom 522467405024411642334❤22custom 590912303642182312611🕊3

28 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC381 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

greeny

custom 522467405024411642332❤9🕊5

28 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC320 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤17🕊5custom 59091230364218231263

25 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC350 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

набор моих кистей в прокрейт

custom 590912303642182312619🕊6❤4

25 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC385 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 590912303642182312628❤16custom 52246740502441164235🕊4🐳2👻1🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @bardaEKB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“барда” (@bardaEKB), 347 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bardaEKB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.