Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FC BARCELONE FR

Channel

FC BARCELONE FR

@barcelonefr

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,965subscribers

+264 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905206442
TypeChannel
Username@barcelonefr
DescriptionL'actualité compléte du FC BARCELONE en français. •Annonce Publicitaire: @Suppor_10 INVITEZ VOS AMIS 🙏 : https://t.me/barcelonefr
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/barcelonefr

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@FCBarceloneFra/5855717 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC@barcelonefr/38306 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC1.0012 minutes
@FCBarceloneFra/5880620 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC@barcelonefr/38357 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC1.0027 minutes
@FCBarceloneFra/5885320 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC@barcelonefr/38365 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC1.0019 minutes
@FCBarceloneFra/5914324 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC@barcelonefr/38411 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC1.002.1 hours
@FCBarceloneFra/5934126 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC@barcelonefr/38459 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC1.0018 minutes
@FCBarceloneFra/5950728 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC@barcelonefr/38489 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC1.001.6 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@FCBarceloneFra85 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0017 minutes@FCBarceloneFra (65–20)
@barcelone_fr33 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0080 minutesthis entry (22–11)
@fansbarcelonais10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9970 minutes@fansbarcelonais (7–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 83 of the 83 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 306 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @FCBarceloneFra. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,70110,1139,90715 August 2026 — 9,701 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,814 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,906 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,913 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,924 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,921 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,894 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,020 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,009 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,077 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,070 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,065 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,051 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,033 subscribers30 September 2026 — 10,011 subscribers5 October 2026 — 10,016 subscribers9 October 2026 — 9,999 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,995 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,034 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,028 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,030 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,088 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,113 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,109 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,079 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,072 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,084 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,070 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,069 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,054 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,044 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,035 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,032 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,017 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,014 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,010 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,001 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,003 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,993 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,965 subscribers9,96515 August 202611 November 2026
40 measurements spanning 88 days, net +264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,639–10,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 06:509,965-28
7 Nov 2026, 07:269,993-10
6 Nov 2026, 09:3610,003+2
5 Nov 2026, 07:2710,001-9
4 Nov 2026, 03:2810,010-4
3 Nov 2026, 01:0710,014-3
2 Nov 2026, 00:3910,017-15
31 Oct 2026, 23:3610,032-3
30 Oct 2026, 23:0710,035-9
29 Oct 2026, 22:3810,044-10
28 Oct 2026, 19:3110,054-15
27 Oct 2026, 16:3010,069-1
26 Oct 2026, 19:3810,070-14
25 Oct 2026, 20:3010,084+12
24 Oct 2026, 22:1610,072-7
23 Oct 2026, 23:2710,079-30
22 Oct 2026, 23:3810,109-4
21 Oct 2026, 18:5010,113+25
20 Oct 2026, 12:1510,088+58
19 Oct 2026, 11:0710,030first reading

Engagement

486 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.25%
avg views ÷ 9,965 subscribers
Avg views / post
324
287 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
287
of 486 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 184 of 287 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held486 (14 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total93,075
Reactions total971
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈33,200
Videos
≈28
Links
≈775

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,084 reactions across 369 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,63188.9%
👍1513.70%
🔥1112.72%
👏681.67%
🤣290.71%
💔220.539%
😁220.539%
🤷‍♂150.367%
👎110.269%
😭100.245%
👀40.098%
🙏40.098%
😍30.073%
😎10.024%
🤝10.024%
🫡10.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 375 of the 486 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,084 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 486 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 287 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC39 viewsread 14 November 2026

🚨🗣️ x.com/MatteMoretto : Ces derniers jours, de nombreuses informations ont circulé au sujet de Balde, notamment sur un possible départ vers l’Italie et un intérêt de l’AS Roma. Il est vrai qu’un départ de Barcelone dès le mois de janvier est envisageable. Cependant, d’après les informations dont je dispose, la Roma a actuellement d’autres priorités.

14 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC90 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Alex Valle : J'aurais pu rester au Barça, mais je n'ai pas de regret d'avoir quitté le club. Je n'étais pas dûr de faire parti de l'équipe première ou du Barça Atlètic. J'ai eu une conversation honnête avec Flick, et quand le Celtic m'a offert la chance de jouer en Ligue des champions, je l'ai saisie.

❤4

14 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🚨⛔️ L’entourage d’Hamza Abdelkarim dément toute négociation avec Côme. Il insiste sur le fait qu’il n’est absolument pas question pour le joueur de quitter le FC Barcelone lors du mercato hivernal de janvier. . x.com/FabrizioRomano

❤2

14 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Joan Laporta : Johan Cruyff est celui qui a posé les bases d’une philosophie de jeu qui a marqué plusieurs générations d’entraîneurs, de Frank Rijkaard à Pep Guardiola, en passant par Luis Enrique et aujourd’hui Hansi Flick. Son héritage est également profondément ancré à La Masia, où la formation ne consiste pas seulement à développer de jeunes talents, mais aussi à former des joueurs qui comprennent le jeu et pa…

❤2

14 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC103 viewsread 14 November 2026

🚨🗣️ Marc Casado : Il n'y a pas de « clause de peur » dans mon contrat qui m'empêche de jouer contre le Barça.

14 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Joan Laporta : À Barcelone, notre ambition est de toujours lutter pour tous les titres. C’est une aspiration profondément ancrée dans notre histoire et notre identité. Notre objectif est de rester compétitifs jusqu’au bout en Liga, en Ligue des champions et en Coupe du Roi. Mais le succès ne se résume pas aux trophées remportés. Notre style de jeu compte tout autant. Nous voulons une équipe fidèle à notre identité…

❤4

14 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC99 viewsread 14 November 2026

🚨🗣️ Joan Laporta : Lamine est un génie, et ce qui le rend encore plus remarquable, c'est sa maturité.

14 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Joan Laporta : Nous sommes extrêmement fiers qu'un joueur du calibre de Lamine soit issu de La Masia et représente les valeurs, l'identité et la philosophie footballistique du FC Barcelone. Notre responsabilité consiste à le protéger, à soutenir son développement et à lui fournir un environnement sportif approprié afin qu'il puisse atteindre son plein potentiel. En tant que président, je suis très fier de Lamine, …

❤3

14 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC141 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🇧🇷 Raphinha est titulaire avec le Brésil

❤4

14 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC167 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Álex Valle : J'aurais pu rester au Barça, mais je ne regrette pas mon départ. Je n'étais pas sûr d'intégrer l'équipe première ou le Barça Atlético. J'ai eu une conversation franche avec Flick, et quand le Celtic m'a offert l'opportunité de jouer en Ligue des champions, je l'ai saisie.

❤3

13 Nov 2026, 23:07 UTC339 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

L’intérêt du FC Barcelone ? 🚨🗣️ Mikautadze : C’est flatteur. C’est le club de mon cœur, depuis tout petit, et je regarde encore leurs matchs aujourd’hui. Il ne tient qu’à moi de travailler pour avoir la chance de rejoindre un grand club comme celui-ci.

❤12

13 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC330 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Le changement de De Jong ? 🚨🗣️ Xavi : Frenkie m'a dit avant le match qu'il avait mal au dos, mais je pense qu'il pourra jouer lundi.

❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 486 posts we hold for @barcelonefr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FC BARCELONE INFOS 🔴
@fansbarcelonais · 31,868
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
Pretty melanin video
@inolwin · 39,517
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 28 August 2026
FC Barcelona Socis i Sòcies
@FCBarcelonaSocis · 101,939
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 August 2026
Fc Barcelone_fr
@barcelone_fr · 20,496
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 September 2026
FOOT MERCATO⚽️
@Foot_Mercato_Fr · 84,349
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
FC BARCELONE™️
@FCBarceloneFra · 55,128
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
REAL MADRID ™️⚪️
@RealMadrid_Fra · 47,859
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
🎬 𝙇𝘼 𝘾𝘼𝙎𝘼 𝘿𝙀 𝙋𝘼𝙋𝙀𝙇 🎬
@LaCasaDePapelEnVF · 104,769
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 2 October 2026
Actu-Foot Archive ⚽️
@Actufoot_Archive · 26,070
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
LALIGA
@LaligaFR · 33,276
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
UEFA Champions League
@UEFA_Champions_League_Worldwide · 77,576
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
PARIS SAINT-GERMAIN
@ParisSGFr · 23,609
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
CANAL DU FOOT ⚽
@CanalPlusSportInfos · 86,135
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
REAL MADRID ACTUALITÉ
@madrilenes · 26,765
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
Infosport Football 🚨 ⚽️
@mondedufootball · 94,344
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
PREMIER LEAGUE ™️🇫🇷
@PremierLeaguefra · 21,725
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 September 2026
Manchester City 🩵
@ManCityFRa · 28,452
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
REAL MADRID INFOS
@RealMadridinfos · 61,553
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Onze Mondial ⚽️
@OnzeMondial · 20,753
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
Arsenal FC
@ArsenalFootballClub_Fr · 22,561
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
INFO SPORTS ⚽️
@infosportsplus · 43,997
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
ONZEDUFOOT
@onzedufoot · 20,843
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
FOOTBALL INFOS ⚽️🏀🎾
@Canal_foot · 133,100
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
LIVERPOOL FC ™️🔴
@LiverpoolFra · 18,444
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FC BARCELONE FR” (@barcelonefr), 9,965 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barcelonefr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.