Le canal officiel en français qui vous donne toutes actualités de la Premier League 🏆
Acheter des annonces : @Suppor_10 / https://telega.io/c/PremierleagueFra
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 58 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 251 of the 251 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 612 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 58 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Beautyinblacksaison3_vf. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 58 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
7 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 91 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,655–22,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 20:09
21,702
-23
11 Nov 2026, 21:49
21,725
-23
10 Nov 2026, 00:36
21,748
-16
8 Nov 2026, 18:01
21,764
-23
7 Nov 2026, 08:09
21,787
-2
6 Nov 2026, 07:50
21,789
-21
5 Nov 2026, 06:46
21,810
-6
4 Nov 2026, 05:51
21,816
-3
3 Nov 2026, 05:39
21,819
-18
2 Nov 2026, 03:34
21,837
-23
1 Nov 2026, 02:49
21,860
-18
31 Oct 2026, 04:30
21,878
-27
30 Oct 2026, 07:26
21,905
-25
29 Oct 2026, 05:30
21,930
-29
28 Oct 2026, 01:49
21,959
-25
27 Oct 2026, 02:49
21,984
+8
26 Oct 2026, 02:38
21,976
+37
25 Oct 2026, 03:07
21,939
+3
24 Oct 2026, 02:08
21,936
-11
23 Oct 2026, 04:37
21,947
first reading
Engagement
907 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.94%
avg views ÷ 21,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
638
335 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
335
of 907 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 322 of 335 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held
907 (15 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total
213,742
Reactions total
4,870
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈37,700
Links
≈48
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
15,896 reactions across 871 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,172
89.2%
🤣
439
2.76%
👍
357
2.25%
🔥
250
1.57%
😢
138
0.868%
😱
125
0.786%
😍
113
0.711%
👏
96
0.604%
🏆
77
0.484%
😁
51
0.321%
🎉
24
0.151%
🙏
24
0.151%
🤩
18
0.113%
❤🔥
6
0.038%
🍾
6
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 875 of the 907 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,896 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 907 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 907 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PremierLeaguefra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 907 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 335 posts held from the last 30 days (2.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 Chelsea et Manchester United auraient formulé une offre de 100 millions d’euros au Barça pour Fermín López ! 💰🏴🏴
Le milieu de terrain aurait refusé les deux clubs, car il souhaite poursuivre son aventure à Barcelone. ❌🇪🇸
🗞️ Alfremartinezz
🚨 CALVIN BASSEY 🇳🇬 EST L’UNE DES PRINCIPALES PISTES DE MAURICIO POCHETTINO 🇦🇷 POUR RENFORCER LA DÉFENSE DE MANCHESTER UNITED EN JANVIER ! ❤️
🗞️ Matt_Law_DT
🇪🇸🏴 À LA VEILLE DU CHOC ENTRE L’ESPAGNE ET L’ANGLETERRE, un journaliste espagnol a demandé à Declan Rice si ce match était l’occasion parfaite pour Harry Kane de prouver qu’il méritait vraiment le Ballon d’Or.
🗣️ DECLAN RICE 🏴 : « Pour moi et pour toute l’Angleterre, Harry méritait le Ballon d’Or.
Regardez sa saison, ses statistiques, les trophées qu’il a remportés et ses performances. Il n’a pas seulem…
💬 DÉCLARATIONS : Le défenseur du FC Barcelone et de l’équipe nationale espagnole, Pau Cubarsí, a révélé quel joueur il prend comme modèle dans le football.
Et la réponse n’est pas une surprise 🐐
🚨 L'Atlético Madrid émerge comme favori pour signer le milieu de terrain d'Arsenal Mikel Merino 🇪🇸, qui souhaite plus de football régulier.
Le joueur de 30 ans n'envisage pas un retour à la Real Sociedad et est attiré par la perspective de rejoindre Diego Simeone.
Le président de l'Atlético Enrique Cerezo a tenu deux réunions avec l'agent de Merino concernant un possible transfert en janvier.
(🗞 elnacionalcat)
🚨✅ NOUVEAU : Selon Fussball_News, Liverpool fait partie des clubs qui suivent de près l’évolution de Maxim De Cuyper (25 ans), tout comme Arsenal et le PSG.
Cependant, Brighton a lié le défenseur belge à un contrat longue durée jusqu’en juin 2030 et n’a que peu d’intérêt à le vendre en janvier.
Mais si ses bonnes performances se poursuivent, la concurrence pour le recruter pourrait considérablement s’intensifier l’…
🚨🚨 « 𝗝'𝗔𝗜 𝗘𝗡𝗩𝗢𝗬𝗘́ 𝗨𝗡 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗟 𝗔 𝗘́𝗧𝗘́ 𝗗𝗘́𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗘́. 😤 »
Thomas Tuchel 🇩🇪 n'a pas apprécié la polémique sur le racisme avant Espagne 🇪🇸 - Angleterre 🏴 ce soir :
« J'ai eu la politesse de répondre à une question d'un de vos collègues 𝗲𝘁 𝘃𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘇 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗲́𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗲 𝗹'𝗘𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗹𝘂𝗶 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝗷'𝗮𝗶 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗲́ 𝗱𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗲.
C'est 𝗨𝗡 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗙𝗔𝗜𝗧 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 de la façon dont on crée de la confusion à partir d…
📸 - Si Mauricio Pochettino est capable de tirer le meilleur de Christian Pulisic… QU’EST-CE QUI L’EMPÊCHE DE FAIRE LA MÊME CHOSE AVEC MARCUS RASHFORD ?! 🔥
Le père et agent d'Alexis Mac Allister, Carlos, sur son contrat :
« Il reste encore 20 mois sur le contrat d'Alexis. Le directeur sportif de Liverpool a changé, tout comme l'entraîneur. La situation est encore en cours d'évaluation et il pourrait y avoir des nouvelles avant la fin de l'année.
« Nous n'avons pas encore entamé de discussions sur une prolongation. Si tout se passe bien, il prolongera ; sinon, ce n'est…
🚨 CHELSEA GARDE UN ŒIL SUR JULES KOUNDÉ 🇫🇷 POUR CET HIVER ! 💙
Le défenseur fait partie des PRIORITÉS des Blues en cas de départ de Malo GUSTO 🇫🇷, ouvert à un transfert dès janvier.
🗞️ mundodeportivo
❤11
Signed Taphar68
Showing the 12 most recent of 907 posts we hold for @PremierLeaguefra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Actu-Foot Archive ⚽️ @Actufoot_Archive · 26,034 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
Arsenal FC @ArsenalFootballClub_Fr · 22,488 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
Manchester City 🩵 @ManCityFRa · 28,452 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
LALIGA @LaligaFR · 33,276 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
LIVERPOOL FC ™️🔴 @LiverpoolFra · 18,444 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 October 2026
REAL MADRID ™️⚪️ @RealMadrid_Fra · 47,859 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Chelsea FC @chelseamylifecfc · 33,711 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
Ligue Des Champions @Champions_League_fifa · 21,114 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 23 September 2026
DENON CENTER 📉📊⚽🏀 @Blue_Lock17 · 21,834 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 17 September 2026
MADRIDISTAS DEL MUNDO IS BACK @MADRIDISTASDELMUNDOBACK · 24,481 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 September 2026
GALACTIC @footballcoupons · 18,061 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 October 2026
⚽️Actu-Foot Zone fR 🇫🇷 @ActuFootZoneFr · 79,783 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 18 August 2026
𝐓𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐬 @Telecharges · 18,394 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 2 October 2026
ONZEDUFOOT @onzedufoot · 20,794 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
Onze Mondial ⚽️ @OnzeMondial · 20,687 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
Top Mercato ⚽️ @TopMercato · 27,198 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
Pro_pronostic0 @codeNMS13 · 35,599 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 31 August 2026
CANAL DU FOOT ⚽ @CanalPlusSportInfos · 86,135 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
Premier League FR 🇫🇷 @PremierLeagueFR · 25,667 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
REAL MADRID ACTUALITÉ @madrilenes · 26,765 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
POWER UNIVERS @PowerBooksVF · 66,030 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 2 October 2026
Infosport Football 🚨 ⚽️ @mondedufootball · 94,344 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
PREMIER LEAGUE ACTU @PLFRANCE · 29,486 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
REAL MADRID INFOS @RealMadridinfos · 61,392 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PREMIER LEAGUE ™️🇫🇷” (@PremierLeaguefra), 21,702 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PremierLeaguefra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.