Channel
@baranovich_psy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001552594549 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baranovich_psy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baranovich_psy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 82 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 80 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 80 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (24 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 84 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
61 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 60.7% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 18.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 18.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вина как защита от бессилия Все эмоции нужны, все эмоции важны. Так и чувство вины выполняет для нас очень важную социальную функцию — оно регулирует наше поведение. Как это происходит? Например, мы случайно забыли о встрече с подругой. Она уже ждёт нас, а мы только проснулись или, ничего не подозревая, заняты каким-то делом. Вина тогда придёт к нам и подтолкнёт к извинениям и исправлению ошибки (предложить другой …
❤5😢1
Читаю книгу Ярославы Рындиной «Садись, пять!». Она про самооценку, зависимость от чужого одобрения, нарциссизм, внутреннего критика, трудности с личными границами и принятием себя — про всё то, с чем я люблю работать! Горячо рекомендую её к прочтению всем, кто хочет иметь устойчивую самооценку и вернуть себе ощущение собственной ценности. В книге есть глава про телесность, захотелось поделиться с вами цитатами из …
❤4👍2🔥2
Выбираем тему эфира
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Нам нужно ваше мнение! Мы готовим для вас эфир и у нас есть три темы, каждая из которых нам очень нравится. И мы решили дать вам право выбрать тему (потому что мы сами не можем) Когда? 3 сентября в 11:00 А теперь выбираем тему голосованием. Внимание, три варианта: 1️⃣ Детские эмоции взрослого человека. Почему мы во взрослом возрасте реагируем как дети и можно ли с этим справиться? 2️⃣ Чувствительность - это сила …
❤3
Выложили мой доклад в рамках фестиваля доказательной групповой психотерапии «Мы вместе — 2026» Приглашаю вас к просмотру Момент выбора: когда мы владеем эмоциями, а не они нами В эфире о том, почему мы часто реагируем импульсивно или, наоборот, подавляем эмоции, как формируются наши стратегии совладания и что делать, чтобы вернуть себе способность выбирать даже в самых эмоционально заряженных ситуациях. Разбирае…
❤4👍2🔥2🥰1
#эмоции
❤4🔥4👍3
Сегодня мы продолжаем вас радовать выступлениями наших ведущих и говорить о важных аспектах групповой динамики и сложных переживаниях: 💚11:00 Практикум "Где мои границы? Работа с границами в групповом формате" Ведущая: Елена Жданова 💚14:00 "Тени прошлого в сегодняшнем дне. Эмоциональные флешбэки при кПТСР" Ведущие: Анна Беленко, Светлана Шрон 💚15:00 "Момент выбора: когда мы владеем эмоциями, а не они нами!" Ведуща…
❤4
Приходите сегодня в 15:00 на мой доклад послушать про управление эмоциями
❤4
🫂Фестиваль доказательной групповой психотерапии "МЫ ВМЕСТЕ - 2026" ✏Сегодня знакомим вас с программой ПЯТОГО ДНЯ 10 ИЮЛЯ 🕛 11:00 💚Практикум "Где мои границы? Работа с границами в групповом формате" Ведущая: Елена Жданова Сейчас много говорят про личные границы каждого человека. Призывают их соблюдать и отстаивать. Но не все знают, что это такое и где они проходят. ✅На практикуме разберёмся: - что такое личные г…
❤3
Мы уже начали вам рассказывать о предстоящем Фестивале, посвященном групповой терапии 2026, который мы будем проводить с 6 по 12 июля. Подробнее здесь А сейчас мы подготовили для вас карточки с описанием Фестиваля. Скоро начнем выкладывать программу и подробное описание докладов, ворк-шопов и практических встреч. Запись на Фестиваль, как всегда, через нашего Бота Команда «Мы вместе»
❤3👍2🔥2
Фестиваль доказательной групповой психотерапии "Мы вместе -2026"! Друзья, мы получили вопросы о том, как будет проходить фестиваль. Рассказываем по порядку. Сохраняйте этот пост, чтобы не потеряться. 🖊️В двух словах: о чём фестиваль? Это неделя живого погружения в мир групповой терапии. 12 практикующих специалистов нашего сообщества проведут лекции, мастерские и дискуссии о том, как исцеляться не в одиночку, а в кр…
❤3👍2🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @baranovich_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем тему эфира
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гармония ума и тела ♾️” (@baranovich_psy), 82 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baranovich_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.